Really makes a lot of folks wonder if that's possible. If there are any "moderate leaders" among them.
I believe that, once embraced sincerely, there's got to be something in their code o' text that inspires them to violence and destruction. I hear and read statements from some muslims who claim to not endorse the violence and lunatic acts of many other muslims who rape, pillage, burn about cartoons and yet seem smug and satisfied when people are murdered and murder otherwise, I hear/read that some muslims "denounce" the rioting and murdering and destruction but no LEADER has.
No one with any authority among them appears and instead, who do appear are those who proliferate and encourage the violence and lunatic behaviors -- OBL, the Imam, etc. -- and so I am nearly concluded in my own views that their ideology, once taken seriously (what it is to be 'devout' within their ideology) means that the violence and destruction are normalized and expected. That means that what it is that is a belief system to them is destruction and mayhem and rape and murder.
They have made no other presentation before the world's population other than those and by those to intimidate others into a suppressed form of obedience, to my view.
I can only conclude by what I see, read and hear and haven't seen, read or heard anything to contradict these conclusions.
Would'nt do them any good. Any mujahadin from a list of millions of hard core moose slimes that would blow away the "apostate" as soon as he got any influence at all.
Would'nt do us too much good, either.
Radical Muslim = "Kill all the Infidels, now!"
Moderate Muslim = "Convert the infidels, and if they don't want to convert, kill them later when we can do so without too many of us dying."