Pardon me, while I exercise my right to be in'sultan'.
Posted on 02/04/2006 2:42:34 PM PST by Cornpone
In recent years, some Christians have been deeply offended by modern "art" that pictures Jesus's face on the lid of a "toilet altar." That has a Crucifix immersed in urine or offers a picture of the Virgin Mary smeared with elephant dung. Some see such images as a blasphemous affront to faith and an attack on believers.
But the American and British artists who produced these images were free to put them on display, and they have been widely reproduced.
Freedom of expression in Canada and other democracies is a cherished, fundamental right. And being free, means being free to challenge, provoke and even offend.
That is the context in which Canadians must consider the fury that has erupted across the Muslim world after the publication of a collection of "blasphemous" caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad in Denmark's Jyllands-Posten newspaper, and reprinted elsewhere. The Qu'ran bans depictions of the Prophet.
These cartoons not only show him, but crudely mock him. One has Muhammad wearing a turban bomb. Another has him wearing the crescent of Islam as devil's horns.
The images have sparked one of the ugliest and, possibly, most hypocritical cultural clashes in years.
Yesterday Muslims in many countries staged huge protests after Friday prayers, demanding the Danish government punish the newspaper for its "Islamophobic" and "racist" cartoons. Ambassadors have been recalled. There have been bomb threats. Attacks on diplomats. An economic boycott. Death threats.
While many Canadians will sympathize with Muslim dismay at this shabby treatment of the Prophet, this reaction is out of proportion to the offence. Those living in Western, secular, democratic societies have long since moved away from the days when blasphemy invited stoning.
That said, the cartoons are problematic for another reason.
They bait Muslims and risk inciting hatred by equating Islam with terror and evil. They would likely withstand a legal challenge here, because the courts wisely give wide latitude to political commentary. Papers are free to air a variety of opinion.
Even so, some of the cartoons are gratuitously offensive. The Star would not have published them, although we affirm our right to do so.
And sadly, there is hypocrisy all around in this melodrama.
Many Muslims who are angry come from Arab states where the press routinely prints cartoons linking the Jewish faith to violence. Recent ones have made a Star of David into a terrorist's face, and have shown an orthodox Jew blowing flame from a ram's horn to scorch an Islamic shrine. Where is the outrage at these images by people who are upset by the caricatures of Mohammed?
By the same token, liberal democrats in Europe and elsewhere who fault the Arab press for invoking religion as a means to make a political point, are poorly placed trying to justify the Danish cartoons, which do the same thing.
Jyllands-Posten had a right to print them. Whether it was wise to exercise that right, is another matter.
Thanks again, Newsweek.
Talk about a freaking LACK OF WISDOM.
While the administration is busy exporting democracy to the middle east, muslims are busy exporting sharia to the west (and based on the response of the U.S. State Department and Jack Straw in the U.K., it looks as though the muslims are winning).
Amen.
Islam is long overdue for a Reformation.
Does anyone think that all bashing of any religion is wrong?
Having said that, to react to such offense with murder shows spiritual bankruptcy and forfeits the right to be called religious.
I don't think so...we can't afford to loose in that sense (spreading democracy).
Islam and reformation are mutually-exclusive terms.
I think any predominantly muslim democracies may vote like democracies or republics, but sharia will be the law of the land.
I think our President is terrific...but IMHO muslim democracies will look more like Hamastan/Talibanistan than America.
Here we have the Red Star showing it's true colors.
Canada Ping!
Please FReepmail me to get on or off this Canada ping list.
|
They would not have published them, but reaffirm their right to do so? Typical leftist drivel. Did they publish photos of "Piss Christ" or the Virgin Mary in elephant dung? If they did, more proof lefties are cowards.
Pardon me, while I exercise my right to be in'sultan'.
Why can't Mr. Bigmouth uncover his face?
Let the Boy? wear it,,,easier to flank...
You can't criticize queer culture in Canada.
Islam is overly reformed, they need a Pope.
Deport all of them back to their pestilential sand and dirt hell holes, where they may properly glory in their misery, and not be offended by freedom.
The other side of my sign will say:
Take Off The Towel You Pu***
Waddya think?
L
I'll download that one get I get home from the EOC. We're going to crank up a new lighting trailer tonight. 50K watts of power and 30K watts of emergency lighting all in one easy to tow package.
The guys have been working on it for months. Tonites the 'smoke test'. I told 'em to take some fire extinguishers just in case but that's kind of silly as these guys are all fire chiefs.
We're never happier than when we have new toys to play with. Wait'll we get the new Comm trailers cranked up..
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.