Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Newspapers Decline to Publish 'Muhammad' Cartoons
Editor and Publisher ^ | 02/03/06 | Joe Strupp

Posted on 02/03/2006 5:05:38 PM PST by Pikamax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 02/03/2006 5:05:41 PM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Is there a site that has these cartoons.

I'd like to pay the proper "homage".

2 posted on 02/03/2006 5:08:21 PM PST by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
They didn't have a problem posting pictures of Abu Garib
3 posted on 02/03/2006 5:08:25 PM PST by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

They won't publish any RAGHEAD cartoons but they run all kinds of trash about Bush Cheney and our GI's. WHAT A---HOLES.


4 posted on 02/03/2006 5:08:57 PM PST by snowman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

A New Zealand blogger (he is conservative by New Zealand standards, which is roughly corresponding to US's moderate conservative side) has remarked on US media that:




http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/archives/013133.html

"Contrary to what many may think I actually regard the NZ media as light-years ahead of much of the US media.

While journalists in NZ are certainly, on average, more left-wing than the average population (which gets reflected in subconscious bias rather than deliberate bias) we have a reasonably balanced press gallery. I get frustrated at the lack of serious research and content in some publications or broadcasters but that's another issue. Yes Radio NZ seems to have a near total absence of conservative commentators but private radio is more diverse so overall not such a big issue.

However in the US (where around 90% of journalists are Democrats) the bias is incredible. Power Line gives a good example of an outrageous New York Times and ABC story on Justice Scalia suggesting he was on a junket instead of being at the swearing in on the Chief Justice.

Personally I don't have an issue with partisan media, so long as they don't pretend to be something else. In NZ for example everyone knows the NBR is right wing and hence its articles are read taking that into account. Likewise everyone knows the Listener is (or was!) left-wing. State owned media are a different matter as they *have* to be non-partisan. Of course in my ideal world we would have no state owned media!"


5 posted on 02/03/2006 5:09:04 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Leftism is like honey mixed with arsenic: initially it tastes good, but that will end up killing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

"They wouldn't meet our standards for what we publish in the paper," said Leonard Downie, Jr., executive editor of The Washington Post, which ran a front-page story on the issue Friday, but has not published the cartoons. "We have standards about language, religious sensitivity, racial sensitivity and general good taste."


Downie of the Wahsington Post is the same a**hole who approved publication of a cartoon mocking a American soldier who was a double amputee.

I guess he is only sensitive to Muslim and anti-American interests.


6 posted on 02/03/2006 5:09:46 PM PST by floridaobserver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Half of those among us are willing dhimmis. I never thought such vast swaths of American society would surrender with virtually no fight. Now I know how the French resistance felt (maybe I'm a bit melodramatic, but it's getting discouraging to see how much leftism has eroded our country).


7 posted on 02/03/2006 5:10:26 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (Moderates do not make history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
These guys who are refusing to run the so-called "Mohammad Cartoons" more than likely published numerous editorials about why "Piss Christ" was just part of the price we pay for free speech.

I think the editors here detect a subtle difference between Moslem fanatics and Christians ~ namely, that it's not like the Christians will ever flay them alive, flense their bones, and toss them into the fields to be eaten by wilddogs ~ however, they can't count on that with the Moslems.

8 posted on 02/03/2006 5:11:53 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax


Interesting how they won't publish muslim stuff but they don't have a problem putting in cartoons, etc. mocking Bush/Cheney/Troops/etc. etc.


9 posted on 02/03/2006 5:12:02 PM PST by rockabyebaby (I'm not afraid to say out loud what the rest of you are afraid to admit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

No problem posting a cartoon of a military combat amputee though.


10 posted on 02/03/2006 5:13:11 PM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

State Department agrees with the US newspapers.

"These cartoons are indeed offensive to the belief of Muslims," State Department spokesman Kurtis Cooper said in answer to a question. "We all fully recognize and respect freedom of the press and expression but it must be coupled with press responsibility. Inciting religious or ethnic hatreds in this manner is not acceptable.


11 posted on 02/03/2006 5:14:03 PM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NZerFromHK

Note: Radio NZ = government owned radio network. Roughly like the US's NPR

Listerner = New Zealand Listener magazine. Generally considered the de rigeur intellectuals' magazine. Predictably Ann Arbor left-wing type and a bit like New Yorker, but may look moderate on the issue of race because it is something that the NZ Left is hypocritical.

NBR = National Business Review. A bit like WSJ and the most conservative NZ-based publication published in this country (excluding the NZ edition of Reader's Digest but it is American headquartered). RINO by US standards except on trade.

Radio NZ: http://www.radionz.co.nz/

NZ Listerner: http://www.listener.co.nz/

NBR: http://www.nbr.co.nz/


12 posted on 02/03/2006 5:14:06 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Leftism is like honey mixed with arsenic: initially it tastes good, but that will end up killing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
What an about face!!!

The print media refuses to show cartoons about the FASLE PROPHET Moohawmed, in deference to the moon worshipers.

Protests have never stopped them from slamming Jesus Christ and Christians.

I guess there becoming "sensitive" and "tolerant".

13 posted on 02/03/2006 5:16:49 PM PST by DeaconNoGood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Hypocritical cowards...


14 posted on 02/03/2006 5:21:18 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
The image problem does not come out of the Koran, but from a Hadith.

Kind of like a life and times of Mohammed. This is also part of the religion. What I like about Islam is it is hard to misinterpret. - Tom

Volume 7, Book 72, Number 833: Narrated Abu Talha : The Prophet said, "Angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog or there are pictures."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 7, Book 72, Number 834: Narrated Muslim:

We were with Masruq at the house of Yasar bin Numair. Masruq saw pictures on his terrace and said, "I heard 'Abdullah saying that he heard the Prophet saying, "The people who will receive the severest punishment from Allah will be the picture makers.'"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 7, Book 72, Number 835: Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar :

Allah's Apostle said, "Those who make these pictures will be punished on the Day of Resurrection, and it will be said to them. 'Make alive what you have created.'"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 7, Book 72, Number 836: Narrated 'Aisha:

I never used to leave in the Prophet house anything carrying images or crosses but he obliterated it.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 7, Book 72, Number 837: Narrated Abu Zur'a:

l entered a house in Medina with Abu Huraira, and he saw a man making pictures at the top of the house. Abu Huraira said, "I heard Allah's Apostle saying that Allah said, 'Who would be more unjust than the one who tries to create the like of My creatures? Let them create a grain: let them create a gnat.' "

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 7, Book 72, Number 838: Narrated 'Aisha:

Allah's Apostle returned from a journey when I had placed a curtain of mine having pictures over (the door of) a chamber of mine. When Allah's Apostle saw it, he tore it and said, "The people who will receive the severest punishment on the Day of Resurrection will be those who try to make the like of Allah's creations." So we turned it (i.e., the curtain) into one or two cushions.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 7, Book 72, Number 840: Narrated 'Aisha :

I purchased a cushion with pictures on it. The Prophet (came and) stood at the door but did not enter. I said (to him), "I repent to Allah for what (the guilt) I have done." He said, "What is this cushion?" I said, "It is for you to sit on and recline on." He said, "The makers of these pictures will be punished on the Day of Resurrection and it will be said to them, 'Make alive what you have created.' Moreover, the angels do not enter a house where there are pictures.'"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 7, Book 72, Number 841: Narrated Abu Talha:

Allah's Apostle said, "Angels (of mercy) do not enter a house where there are pictures.'" The sub-narrator Busr added: "Then Zaid fell ill and we paid him a visit. Behold! There was, hanging at his door, a curtain decorated with a picture. I said to 'Ubaidullah Al-Khaulani, the step son of Maimuna, the wife of the Prophet , "Didn't Zaid tell us about the picture the day before yesterday?" 'Ubaidullah said, "Didn't you hear him saying: 'except a design in a garment'?"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 7, Book 72, Number 842: Narrated Anas:

Aisha had a thick curtain (having pictures on it) and she screened the side of her i house with it. The Prophet said to her, "Remove it from my sight, for its pictures are still coming to my mind in my prayers."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 7, Book 72, Number 843: Narrated Salim's father:

Once Gabriel promised to visit the Prophet but he delayed and the Prophet got worried about that. At last he came out and found Gabriel and complained to him of his grief (for his delay). Gabriel said to him, "We do not enter a place in which there is a picture or a dog."

15 posted on 02/03/2006 5:25:48 PM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconNoGood

I agree; the MSM is just being a bunch of spineless, hypocritical cowards.


16 posted on 02/03/2006 5:26:40 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

The truth hurts, Muzzies. Image hosting by Photobucket
17 posted on 02/03/2006 5:27:56 PM PST by JHBowden (Go White Sox -- World Champs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

This is one of the offending cartoons. Maybe they'd feel better if we flushed it down the toilet?

18 posted on 02/03/2006 5:28:08 PM PST by melt (Someday, they'll wish their Jihad... Jihadn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

It's probably for the best that U.S. newspapers not publish these cartoons. Publishing them would not accomplish anything worthwhile, and certainly not benefit the national interest.

I don't like radical Islamists anymore than anyone else on FR. But there's no point in inflaming them unnecessarily, particularly when there's so little to be gained from it.


19 posted on 02/03/2006 5:28:09 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (John Paul Stevens for retirement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

And the dinosaur takes one more step out into the tarpits...


20 posted on 02/03/2006 5:28:48 PM PST by gridlock (eliminate perverse incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson