[Candor7]

"It's sad a journalist doesn't understand the need to back up his article's premise with any evidence. That's some good ol' fashioned lefty reporting there."

Well get this from the referenced article in the Guardian:

Quote:

The crimes were two counts of aggravated sexual assault (based on admissions that the defendant had, over the course of four years starting when the child victim was 6 years old, licked the child’s vagina on multiple occasions and placed his penis in the child’s mouth at least once) and one count of lewd and lascivious conduct (based on an admission that the child had stroked his penis “quite a few times”).

After revealing a padded set of what the actual molestation facts indeed were, the reporter simply goes on to whip up more of his liberal/socialist double think.The reporter doesn't even seem to be capable of understanding what had been done to the mind and heart of this little girl, now propably emotionally warped for life! The reporter did not even acknowledge the child as a human being , as if she was some kind of animal pet to be cast aside in the circumlocution of his ideological arguments

Conclusion: The reporter and all of his similar thinking socialist/liberal cronies and judges are DUMBER THAN A BOX OF ROCKS!

[Unrepentant VN Vet]

"Conclusion: The reporter and all of his similar thinking socialist/liberal cronies and judges are DUMBER THAN A BOX OF ROCKS!"

---

Wrong. Accusing them of being "dumb" only supplies them with an excuse.

The arrogant bunch of bums simply think that everybody around them is stupid enough to buy this crap.

They won't be the first ones disabused of that notion over the last few years........