The author is another Chicken Little idiot who can't decipher a fact to save his life. Just looking for a chance to put on the professional victimology wardrobe and rend his garments while screaming "betrayal." 'Sierra Times' should be a tipoff that what follows is likely tinfoil or hysteria.
And there's a sucker registered every minute, it seems...
"'Sierra Times' should be a tipoff that what follows is likely tinfoil or hysteria.
"
Yes. "Sierra Times" is often the source for postings here, but it is not a reliable source. Sadly, it often engages in distortions of fact to make a political point.
The author is another Chicken Little idiot who can't decipher a fact to save his life. Just looking for a chance to put on the professional victimology wardrobe and rend his garments while screaming "betrayal." 'Sierra Times' should be a tipoff that what follows is likely tinfoil or hysteria.
And there's a sucker registered every minute, it seems...
Hey, D.E.
It seems to follow a recent pattern: when the Left doesn't get what it wants, it tries to delegitimize the victor's (victors') victory. Cases in point:
a. Saying that President Bush was selected, not elected, after the 2000 recount
b. Claiming that "a million African Americans were disenfranchised/denied the ability to vote" before and after the 2004 Elections (a claim I never heard after Carter and Clinton's victories...but I digress)
c. Both the presidential and the vice presidential candidates feeling the need to mention that one of Dick Cheney's daughters is a lesbian, in order to fracture the Republican support for Bush and Cheney;
d. Contesting the Ohio Electoral Vote count on January 6 in the House and Senate;
e. Complaining about the cost of having another inaugural celebration (since we were at war, and since GW had already had one...again, I heard no such argument when Clinton had his second inaugural)
...and so on. Trying to depress the winners' base, whether an election is coming, or not. So predictable, so stupid...so...Left.