To: sageb1
"Perhaps it was something as simple as the construction worker who caused the first fire wanting to deflect blame from himself? Could he/she have driven to all the churches afterwards and started fires?"Your's is an extremely simple question.
After bruising my lower jaw on my keyboard after reading your absolutely INCREDIBLE post.....I will tell you this axiom: if such a scenario were indeed "fact", it would not BE "simple". It would be worthy of serious criminal profiling on an equal level with most of the hypotheses presented on this thread (all of which overlap your own theory).
235 posted on
02/03/2006 10:59:17 AM PST by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: One Wing to Rule them All and to the Darkside Bind them)
To: cake_crumb
Did I just hear someone on FNC (don't know if that's what you watch) say it is possible that more than one person could be involved? If that was true, what about the contruction company itself? I have absolutely no info on who or how many were working on the first church that burned. I am only basing a theory on someone else's prior post. I have no facts. It was just a thought.
249 posted on
02/03/2006 11:20:06 AM PST by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson