America As You Know It May Soon Be Over

National Health Federation ^ | January 19, 2006 | Cheri Tips

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

NATIONAL

HEALTH

FEDERATION

A NOT-FOR-PROFIT HEALTH ORGANIZATION                                                        

 

 

PRESS RELEASE

 

ALERT

America As You Know It May Soon Be Over
 

OPPOSE

The North American Cooperative Security Act (NACSA)

(S.853 & H.R.2672)

by Cheri Tips
January 19, 2006

 

This urgent alert is being sent to all Congress Members.

 

 

Even I, as a hardened health-freedom fighter, became physically ill putting this information together to alert you, the reader, to one of the most damning acts against America and its citizens. If you are a true American, the information that I will convey, should make your blood boil. The issue is quite convoluted, involving a number of players, and to fully envision the total impact of this legislation, please thoroughly read through the information below, then alert everyone you know and contact your Congressperson in opposition. 

 

Why should you actively oppose this legislation?

• It is unconstitutional.
   

• It will destroy America as we know it by further internationalizing our laws, rules, and regulations.
   

• By merging our "security" measures with Canada and Mexico, it will serve as a huge stepping stone to planned unification in all other areas with those two countries as a "North American Union."
   

• Just as the European Union started out as a harmless "tariff free zone," this bill is intended to drive us into the arms of a similar union with Canada and Mexico, a union which will be even more removed from the wishes of the American people and even more foreign to our principles of freedom.
   

• By opening our northern (Canada) and southern (Mexico) borders, it will actually allow terrorists easier access into the United States because of their ability to also easily enter our neighbors' countries.
   

• It will mean yet another bureaucracy with even greater, expanded regulatory powers, which goes against our basic American concepts of freedom set forth in the Constitution.
   

• It will mean more surveillance and controls over law-abiding, innocent citizens.
   

• It will guarantee the loss of American laws and customs as we are submerged into a regional harmonization plan, the foundations for which have already been set in place with the passage of NAFTA, CAFTA, and the soon-to-appear FTAA legislation.
   

• As part of that process, it will ensure that our freedom-enhancing dietary supplement laws are harmonized to European-dictated, restrictive UN Codex international food-supplement standards that are anti-health, anti-consumer, and pro-drug.

Don't let this become one of your last acts of exercising your constitutional rights. Fight back now and help the NHF turn America away from this disastrous road to harmonization and union that will result in the loss of our health and other freedoms.

Please read further to fully understand the full scope of this dangerous legislation.
 

 

 

 

Senate Bill 853 was introduced 4/20/05, sponsored by Senator Richard G. Lugar (IN) and has 6 cosponsors (Senators-Coleman (MN), Hagel (NE), McCain (AZ), Cornyn (TX), Hutchison (TX), and Stevens (AK).

 

Bill Title - A bill to direct the Secretary of State to establish a program to bolster the mutual security and safety of the United States, Canada, and Mexico, and for other purposes.

 

Bill Summary - Click here. 

 

Bill Status - Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

 

 

 

 

House Bill 2672 was introduced 5/26/2005, sponsored by Rep Katherine Harris (FL-13) with two cosponsors (Pearce (NM) and Shays (CT-4).

 

Bill Summary - Click here.

 

Bill Status

- 6/6/2005 Referred to House subcommittee (Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment.)

 

 

 

 

The Players and Their Instruments of Destruction

 

The

North American Security Cooperative Act is touted as a bill to protect the American public from terrorists by creating the North American Union.  The North American Union consists of three countries, U.S., Canada, and Mexico, with open borders, something that is proposed to be in effect by 2010.  Thus, it would ensure the fulfillment of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. See:  http://www.spp.gov/spp/factsheet.asp?dName=fact_sheets.

 

This is sheep's clothing billed as for the good of security and the economies, but it truly means the end of America and U.S. sovereignty. Many things tie together -the passage of NAFTA, CAFTA, the forthcoming

FTAA (Free Trade Areas of the Americas), which we must oppose, Task Force Report #53 (Building a North American Community), FDA - already making plans to harmonize with Canada and Mexico via the Trilateral Cooperation Charter.  The completion of the Interstate 69 Corridor (Trans Texas Corridor), which the Texas State Legislature voted for and passed in June 2003, H.R. 3585. This huge highway project, with sections already completed, will run through the United States from its southern border of Mexico through to the northern border of Canada, and will be the icing on the cake for those who want to dissolve the American way of life. http://www.i69info.com/state.html

 

We must lobby Congress to prevent losing America as we know it and the rights for freedom that our forefathers struggled so hard to retain. We must oppose being harmonized to international standards, prevent the implementation of a European Union type status reminiscent of what has occurred with the UK and the EU, fight to retain our constitutional rights, and our DSHEA rights that will not exist if we are to be harmonized to international Codex standards.

 

Please review the information and articles below detailing the documents and entities that are currently involved in removing American freedom forever:

 

An excellent article by Steven Yates, "Erasing America" details the plans of the Council on Foreign Affairs and their documented plan -Building a North American Community. 

 

http://www.newswithviews.com/Yates/steven11.htm

 

 

 

Building a North American Community - Council on Foreign Relations
 

Council of Foreign Relations consists of government officials, global leaders, and the Foreign Relations Council and they produced Task Force Report # 53.

 

Task Force Report No. 53

North America is vulnerable on several fronts: the region faces terrorist and criminal security threats, increased economic ...

http://www.cfr.org/publication/8102/building_a_north_american_community.html

(link where you can order Report #53)

 

Overview of the report: 

Task Force Report No. 53

 

Press Releases: English | French | Spanish

 

Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations in association with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales.

 

North America is vulnerable on several fronts: the region faces terrorist and criminal security threats, increased economic competition from abroad, and uneven economic development at home. In response to these challenges, a trinational, Independent Task Force on the Future of North America has developed a roadmap to promote North American security and advance the well-being of citizens of all three countries.

 

When the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States met in Texas recently they underscored the deep ties and shared principles of the three countries. The Council-sponsored Task Force applauds the announced "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America," but proposes a more ambitious vision of a new community by 2010 and specific recommendations on how to achieve it.
 

 

 

 

CAFTA -  requires us to create a Sanitary Phytosanitary Measures Committee which would pressure Congress into changing our laws as they pertain to dietary supplements, to harmonize to restrictive Codex standards, and the FTAA would go much further as discussed in this article "THE GROWING THREATS TO DSHEA"  written by NHF Vice-Chairman Paul Anthony Taylor.

http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/us/index.html 

 

 

 

 

FDA - The FDA is already holding discussions with its counterparts in Canada and Mexico via the Trilateral Cooperation Charter http://www.fda.gov/oia/charter.html to set us up for harmonization even though the NORTH AMERICAN COOPERATIVE SECURITY ACT has not been passed into law. From the FDA's definition of "health fraud" in this "Cooperation Charter" it's apparent that the FDA wants to harmonize US law to restrictive Codex standards that go against the will of the people as abundantly declared in 1994 when we generated the largest volume of mail to congress on ANY issue in the HISTORY of congress when we passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994.

 

 

 

 

I 69 Trans Texas Corridor (NAFTA Corridors)

You must read this e-letter addressed to Texas Govenor, Rick Perry, from Texan Jeannon Kralj of Austin, opposing the Corridor and its intended purpose, to destroy America. (Provided by John Hammell of IAHF.)

http://www.thenhf.com/government_affairs_72.htm

 

 

 

 

Articles related to the subject:

 

Abolishing America by William Jasper 

http://www.stoptheftaa.org/artman/publish/article_582.shtml

 

 

 

 

The only media coverage to date on this takeover of America. (Provided by John Hammell of IAHF.) Lou Dobbs of CNN, June 2005 -

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/09/ldt.01.html.

 

Excerpt from above link of the news coverage:

 

DOBBS: Border security is arguably the critical issue in this country's fight against radical Islamist terrorism. But our borders remain porous. So porous that three million illegal aliens entered this country last year, nearly all of them from Mexico.

Now, incredibly, a panel sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations wants the United States to focus not on the defense of our own borders, but rather create what effectively would be a common border that includes Mexico and Canada.

Christine Romans has the report.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CHRISTINE ROMANS, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): On Capitol Hill, testimony calling for Americans to start thinking like citizens of North America and treat the U.S., Mexico, and Canada like one big country.

ROBERT PASTOR, IND. TASK FORCE ON NORTH AMERICA: The best way to secure the United States today is not at our two borders with Mexico and Canada, but at the borders of North America as a whole.

ROMANS: That's the view in a report called "Building a North American Community." It envisions a common border around the U.S., Mexico, and Canada in just five years, a border pass for residents of the three countries, and a freer flow of goods and people.

Task force member Robert Pastor.

PASTOR: What we hope to accomplish by 2010 is a common external tariff which will mean that goods can move easily across the border. We want a common security perimeter around all of North America, so as to ease the travel of people within North America.

ROMANS: Buried in 49 pages of recommendations from the task force, the brief mention, "We must maintain respect for each other's sovereignty." But security experts say folding Mexico and Canada into the U.S. is a grave breach of that sovereignty.

FRANK GAFFNEY, CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY: That's what would happen if anybody serious were to embrace this strategy for homogenizing the United States and its sovereignty with the very different systems existing today in Canada and Mexico.

ROMANS: Especially considering Mexico's problems with drug trafficking, human smuggling, and poverty. Critics say the country is just too far behind the U.S. and Canada to be included in a so-called common community. But the task force wants military and law enforcement cooperation between all three countries.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Indeed, an exchange of personnel that bring Canadians and Mexicans into the Department of Homeland Security.

ROMANS: And it wants temporary migrant worker programs expanded with full mobility of labor between the three countries in the next five years.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

ROMANS: The idea here is to make North America more like the European Union. Yet, just this week, voters in two major countries in the European Union voted against upgrading -- updating the European constitution. So clearly, this is not the best week to be trying to sell that idea.

DOBBS: Americans must think that our political and academic elites have gone utterly mad at a time when three-and-a-half years, approaching four years after September 11, we still don't have border security. And this group of elites is talking about not defending our borders, finally, but rather creating new ones. It's astonishing.

ROMANS: The theory here is that we are stronger together, three countries in one, rather than alone.

DOBBS: Well, it's a -- it's a mind-boggling concept. Christine Romans, thank you, as always.

 

There is no greater example than our next story as to why the United States must maintain its border security with Mexico, and importantly, secure that border absolutely. The police chief of the violent Mexican border town, Nuevo Laredo, was today executed. It was his first day on the job.

Alejandro Dominguez, seen here at his swearing-in ceremony, was ambushed by a number of gunmen several hours just after that ceremony as he left his office. The assassins fired more than three dozen rounds that struck Dominguez.

He was the only person who volunteered to become Nuevo Laredo's police chief. The position has been vacant for weeks after the previous chief of police resigned. The town is at the center of what is a violent war between Mexican drug lords. The State Department has issued two travel warnings for Americans about that area just this year. And amazingly, the Mexican government calls those State Department warnings unnecessary.

 

 

 

 

Insight into the Council on Foreign Affairs & The Trilateral Commission

by Patrick Wood

The Global Elite: Who Are They?

http://www.newswithviews.com/Wood/patrick6.htm 

 

 

 

 

Vicente Fox, and the impact of Mexico on our country's future is presented by author Frosty Wooldridge, who has covered all aspects of the immigration crisis in his many excellent articles.

 

America Will Become America Again

http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty119.htm
by Frosty Wooldridge

 

 

 

 

Scuttling Bad Trade Agreements by Steven Yates

http://www.thenhf.com/government_affairs_70.htm

 

 

 

 

(Portions of the information above were provided by John Hammell of IAHF, who has also researched the issue and is actively organizing opposition.)

 

HELP SAVE AMERICA

 

 

 

 

SAMPLE PETITION LETTER

Click here to go to cut and paste text that can be used for the

Oppose the North American Cooperative Security Act Petition

action form input boxes on the Petition Submission Page via the link below.

 

 

 

 

PETITION SUBMISSION PAGE

Click here to go to a convenient submission page that will enable you to send an

Oppose the North American Cooperative Security Act Petition to your Congressperson.

 

Use the Sample Petition Letter link above to easily fill in the action form input boxes

provided on the Petition Submission Page.

 

 

 

 

Click on the following links below for individual mailing addresses for
letter writing and other contact info for Congress Members:

Senate
House of Representatives

 

 

 

 

Congressional Switch Board can be reached via 202-225-3121, ask to speak
with your senators and Congressman.

 

 

 

 

For those of you receiving this alert, who are not yet NHF members,

please consider joining now.
We need your support.
http://www.thenhf.com/join_the_nhf.html

 

P.O. Box 688, Monrovia, CA 91017 USA ~ 1 (626) 357-2181 ~ Fax 1 (626) 303-0642

Website:  www.thenhf.com                      E-mail:  contact-us@thenhf.com

[steve8714]

The tinfoil is more properly formed into a hat..

[steve8714]

You'd have to take over either NAM or the CofC.

[redgolum]

Heh, it is Friday so I can wear my tin foil beanie with pride (Friday is my personal Conspiracy day)!

In all seriousness, I watched the History Channel show on Stalin last night. Alot of the old Soviet goals and plans have been reincarnated by the UN.

But we in the US are much better armed than the Russian peasants were, and less easy to control.

[hedgetrimmer]

Now we are told that our standard of living is increasing because we can buy poorly-made products at a greatly reduced price.

This sleight of hand lets the federal government pretend that there is no inflation, and therefore claim our standard of living is rising. Of course, they don't count energy prices, or housing prices. By counting wages, which are deflating because of competition with slave and very low wage labor, and the poorly made junk that is making the communists wealthy beyond belief, they skew the truth.

[hedgetrimmer]

But we in the US are much better armed than the Russian peasants were, and less easy to control

Since you are aware that the soviet goals and plans have been reincarnated in the UN, you must also be aware that those same goals have found root in the US. The education system, which was once meant to create individuals who could make well reasoned decisions and therefore become self governing, is now modeled after the collectivist soviet system. We have too many citizens, as seen on this post, who have no concept of individual rights and our responsibilities to maintain a constitutional government and therefore our freedom.

The influence of the UN in the US is much greater than most people allow. UNCTAD, ECLAC, WTO, World Bank, IMF,nearly all the instruments of globalization (except the US government) are subsidiary branches of the UN. While not directly under the influence, the US government has been corrupted by these groups, This consortium of anti American, anti individualist interests has a great deal of influence on the US and our policies, even our domestic policies. These organizations are demonstrably dangerous to the 'old America'.

They are not coming at us with weapons, but with philosophies that are subverting the citizens. Guns cannot protect us in this war, because it is a war of ideas.

[Bernard Marx]

Yes, we've reached the stage where I'm almost as distrustful of some of our business institutions as the government. Some years ago I drew the line at electronic bill-paying. I know once a company can automatically withdraw cash from my bank account I'm essentially screwed. It can raise prices almost at will and if I have a complaint or a problem -- forget it! There's no way of reaching anyone who can do anything about except to sit through hours of "Press 1 if you wish to speak in Urdu," too-loud bad music and endless harangues about new added-cost 'services' while on hold. The object is to extract more money or get rid of you.

I realize I'm a Neanderthal but I prefer to pay bills by check. Now I've learned my bank can't even track all checks that have cleared because some businesses do it electronically -- no paper. Maybe that's a worthy goal and perfectly understandable to younger folks. But to me it's a paradigm-shift, and an important, scary one. Control of my personal finances has been taken out of my hands. It's now just a tiny step to a cashless society where salaries are electronically credited to an account, then electronically withdrawn by anyone from the IRS to the grocery store. Anyone who realizes the impact of payroll withholding by the IRS and FDIC can see where this is heading. O Brave New World! Guess it's time to take my Soma.

[Nowhere Man]

We used to increase our standard of living by increasing wages, inventing new and better technology, and improving products and customer service. Those are the hallmarks of a strong nation with a robust economy.

Now we are told that our standard of living is increasing because we can buy poorly-made products at a greatly reduced price.

The psychological implications of this attitude are enough to doom us.

Exactly. BTw, I'm watching the CBS Superbowl Commercial Countdown on a 1966 Sony B&W TV as I type this on the computer I am on, a 1992 486SX/25 (running Windows 3.1 with 4 megs of RAM and 120 meg HD) since I'm in the room feeding my cats. B-) I am feeling a bit retro. B-)

Getting to that, there are some of our detractors who would say that we have it better now with the computers like the Pentium 4, internet and so on and they are true although they are not taking into account that different eras had different standards.

One guy on a thread brought up that in the late 1970's, one of the best computers then was a TRS-80 model I and we had no internet then but had dial-up BBS'es (computer bulletin boards) and the like back then. Yes, by today's standards they are quaint and backward but by 1970's standards, they were state of the art. If you took a Pentium IV back in time to 1979, it would be as seen as a minature Cray supercomputer of that time. It's like how the liberals judged many of the Founding Fathers to be bad because they had slaves but they are using 20th and 21st Century standards to judge 18th and 19th Century people.

I guess you like the Garand rifle. If I could only have one rifle, the Garand would be it although it would closely be followed by an M-14 (son of Garand) or the FN-FAL.

[muir_redwoods]

America As You Know It May Soon Be Over National Health Federation ^ | January 19, 2006 | Cheri Tips

Cheri Tips?

[airborne]

ROMANS: The theory here is that we are stronger together, three countries in one, rather than alone.

The beginning of the NWO. One world government.

[garandgal]

I guess you like the Garand rifle.

Yup, not many people seem to get my name. I'm a big WWII buff; lots of guys depended on that reliable rifle.

I collect WWII posters; I'm always excited when I can find one (for a reasonable price...rarely) which features the Garand.