Skip to comments.
Boeing 777-200LR Worldliner Certified to Carry Passengers Around the World
Boeing.com ^
| Feb. 02, 2006
| Staff
Posted on 02/02/2006 1:38:12 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
But doesn't it only have the range to go a little less than half way around the world?
To: COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; ...
If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.
To: Paleo Conservative
There are planes on the drawing board that could take off from St. Louis and land back in St. Louis in less than 10 minutes.
3
posted on
02/02/2006 1:40:18 PM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
There are planes on the drawing board that could take off from St. Louis and land back in St. Louis in less than 10 minutes.You mean they're actually designed to develop engine trouble within 5 minutes of takeoff?
4
posted on
02/02/2006 1:41:24 PM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: Paleo Conservative
To: dead
There were planes that could do that 100 years ago. ; )
6
posted on
02/02/2006 1:43:02 PM PST
by
Nakota
To: dead
There were planes that could do that 100 years ago. ; )
7
posted on
02/02/2006 1:43:23 PM PST
by
Nakota
To: dead
I ain't going over any pond with only two engines. Period. I betcha the gas mileage is good though.
8
posted on
02/02/2006 1:44:27 PM PST
by
jmq
(Islam=Religion of Peace)
To: jmq
Dang, we lose one more and it'll take us forever to get there! (old punchline)
9
posted on
02/02/2006 1:46:00 PM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: Paleo Conservative
I want to know if you have a site you like for mapping navigational distances between cities, because a Great Circle Mapper I found says SYD-NYC is 9,938 miles, or out of reach.
To: Paleo Conservative
But doesn't it only have the range to go a little less than half way around the world? The circumference of the earth at its widest point is about 25,000 miles, or a jet needs about a 12,500 range to fly half-way around the earth. However, many international flights go over the North Pole, e.g., to shorten the distance. For example, the shortest distance from Chicago to Japan would be to take that type of alternative route, not fly directly west to Japan.
11
posted on
02/02/2006 1:47:19 PM PST
by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: Paleo Conservative
Looking forward to a Dallas to Moscow link.... At least one can hope.
12
posted on
02/02/2006 1:49:06 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(SUPPORT THE DANES! BURN A KORAN!)
To: jmq
I ain't going over any pond with only two engines. Period. I betcha the gas mileage is good though. According to engineers - more engines means more probablity something will go wrong with an engine. But saying it in my head and sitting in said plane are 2 different things :)
13
posted on
02/02/2006 1:49:45 PM PST
by
Godwinson
("The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom)
To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
But look at the title of the thread. It says the 777-200LR has been certified to carry passengers around the world.
To: dead
Are they manned? My math is horrid - but every calc I run comes up with that scenario causing killer g-forces due to acceleration.
To: Godwinson; jmq
I've flown across both the Atlantic and the Pacific on 777s. Lots of airlines do it all the time. What's the BFD?
16
posted on
02/02/2006 1:51:52 PM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Hegewisch Dupa
They have inertial dampeners. Don't you watch Star Trek or Stargate?
17
posted on
02/02/2006 1:53:38 PM PST
by
hattend
To: Paleo Conservative
That's a LOT of "777"'s in one article...
18
posted on
02/02/2006 1:55:15 PM PST
by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
Boy! You sure faked yourself out with that explanation. Only at the equator is flying east or west the shortest route.
For all other two cities (not on the equator) the so-called "polar route" is always used.
Even between San Francisco and New York.
To: hattend
BOEING stock (BA) STRONG BUY!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson