Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing 777-200LR Worldliner Certified to Carry Passengers Around the World
Boeing.com ^ | Feb. 02, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 02/02/2006 1:38:12 PM PST by Paleo Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
But doesn't it only have the range to go a little less than half way around the world?
1 posted on 02/02/2006 1:38:15 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; ...

If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.

2 posted on 02/02/2006 1:39:15 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

There are planes on the drawing board that could take off from St. Louis and land back in St. Louis in less than 10 minutes.


3 posted on 02/02/2006 1:40:18 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
There are planes on the drawing board that could take off from St. Louis and land back in St. Louis in less than 10 minutes.

You mean they're actually designed to develop engine trouble within 5 minutes of takeoff?

4 posted on 02/02/2006 1:41:24 PM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Here's another positive Boeing thread posted today.
Boeing reaches for cloud nine
The News Tribune ^ | February 2nd, 2006 02:30 AM | JOHN GILLIE

Posted on 02/02/2006 2:52:51 PM CST by Paleo Conservative

5 posted on 02/02/2006 1:41:48 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

There were planes that could do that 100 years ago. ; )


6 posted on 02/02/2006 1:43:02 PM PST by Nakota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead

There were planes that could do that 100 years ago. ; )


7 posted on 02/02/2006 1:43:23 PM PST by Nakota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead

I ain't going over any pond with only two engines. Period. I betcha the gas mileage is good though.


8 posted on 02/02/2006 1:44:27 PM PST by jmq (Islam=Religion of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmq

Dang, we lose one more and it'll take us forever to get there! (old punchline)


9 posted on 02/02/2006 1:46:00 PM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I want to know if you have a site you like for mapping navigational distances between cities, because a Great Circle Mapper I found says SYD-NYC is 9,938 miles, or out of reach.


10 posted on 02/02/2006 1:46:11 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
But doesn't it only have the range to go a little less than half way around the world?

The circumference of the earth at its widest point is about 25,000 miles, or a jet needs about a 12,500 range to fly half-way around the earth. However, many international flights go over the North Pole, e.g., to shorten the distance. For example, the shortest distance from Chicago to Japan would be to take that type of alternative route, not fly directly west to Japan.

11 posted on 02/02/2006 1:47:19 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Looking forward to a Dallas to Moscow link.... At least one can hope.


12 posted on 02/02/2006 1:49:06 PM PST by Centurion2000 (SUPPORT THE DANES! BURN A KORAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmq
I ain't going over any pond with only two engines. Period. I betcha the gas mileage is good though. According to engineers - more engines means more probablity something will go wrong with an engine. But saying it in my head and sitting in said plane are 2 different things :)
13 posted on 02/02/2006 1:49:45 PM PST by Godwinson ("The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

But look at the title of the thread. It says the 777-200LR has been certified to carry passengers around the world.


14 posted on 02/02/2006 1:50:26 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dead
Are they manned? My math is horrid - but every calc I run comes up with that scenario causing killer g-forces due to acceleration.
15 posted on 02/02/2006 1:51:40 PM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Godwinson; jmq

I've flown across both the Atlantic and the Pacific on 777s. Lots of airlines do it all the time. What's the BFD?


16 posted on 02/02/2006 1:51:52 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

They have inertial dampeners. Don't you watch Star Trek or Stargate?


17 posted on 02/02/2006 1:53:38 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

That's a LOT of "777"'s in one article...


18 posted on 02/02/2006 1:55:15 PM PST by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
Boy! You sure faked yourself out with that explanation. Only at the equator is flying east or west the shortest route.

For all other two cities (not on the equator) the so-called "polar route" is always used.

Even between San Francisco and New York.

19 posted on 02/02/2006 1:55:27 PM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hattend

BOEING stock (BA) STRONG BUY!


20 posted on 02/02/2006 1:55:57 PM PST by Republic Rocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson