Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: workerbee

There may be some merit to this case.

Current (the over-the-grid communications carrier) would find it difficult to separate itself from (Gore's) Current Media if, in the future, it actually carried the (Gore) network over its network.

(Gore's) network might be seen as a subsidiary of the carrier.

Who is the publisher that is owned by Viacom that "conveniently" hawks it books on faux-news shows on its own TV network (CBS).

My guess is, they (grid carrier) would not want that to be the appearance. (Duzzat make sense to anyone but me????)


5 posted on 02/02/2006 1:06:38 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Penthouse had articles? Whodathunkit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Sorry, 4th sentence was menat to be a question as I forgot the name of the book publisher involved.


6 posted on 02/02/2006 1:07:33 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Penthouse had articles? Whodathunkit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson