Could hardly wait to go liberal.
1 posted on
02/02/2006 10:14:03 AM PST by
sefarkas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: sefarkas
"undue suffering"
That same argument can be used by his victims to fry the SOB.
To: sefarkas
Now let's not freak out yet. There are some real issues with that "cocktail." It's not like he was a swing vote or anything, either.
3 posted on
02/02/2006 10:16:10 AM PST by
piytar
To: sefarkas
Nitrogen asphyxiation. Cheep, painless, effective.
To: sefarkas
"The way a justice votes on a stay request does not necessarily signal how the justice will rule on the merits of a death penalty case. The court earlier this week granted a similar stay of execution to another death row inmate from Florida."
Right now, it is too early to tell. This involves procedural aspects rather than merits of the case. Clarence Thomas has voted this way in the past only to later rule against the petitioner on the merits.
5 posted on
02/02/2006 10:18:43 AM PST by
rowhey
To: sefarkas
BS. It was a 9-0 decision. There have been a number of incorrect articles floating around.
6 posted on
02/02/2006 10:19:11 AM PST by
adam_az
(It's the border, stupid!)
To: sefarkas
Could hardly wait to go liberal. Evidently you couldn't wait to show how ill-informed you are.
7 posted on
02/02/2006 10:20:28 AM PST by
Howlin
(Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
To: sefarkas
/Couldn't hardly wait to post without searching.
9 posted on
02/02/2006 10:23:05 AM PST by
TonyInOhio
(Apparently, I'm easily amused.)
To: sefarkas
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1569812/posts
9-0, but it was a moot procedural vote anyway.
"WASHINGTON -- New Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito cast his first vote on Wednesday, as the court refused to give Missouri permission to immediately execute a man who killed a teenage honor student.
The court's 9-0 action was procedural, however, because a stay was already set to expire Wednesday afternoon. "
Alito also had been on the USSCJ for only 16 hours or so. Even if this article was true.... maybe he wanted more time to review the case before deciding?
10 posted on
02/02/2006 10:23:49 AM PST by
adam_az
(It's the border, stupid!)
To: sefarkas
He's doing exactly what he said he would do.
Rush already talked about this.
To: sefarkas
Could hardly wait to go liberal.Evidently you didn't watch the Alito hearings.
14 posted on
02/02/2006 10:29:15 AM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
To: sefarkas
Some here are acting very paranoid over one ruling which, if Limbaugh is right, was exactly what he said he'd do.
The MSM is just letting their own wishing thinking about Alito being another Souter get in the way.
16 posted on
02/02/2006 10:35:03 AM PST by
NapkinUser
("Our troops have become the enemy." -Representative John P. Murtha, modern day Benedict Arnold.)
To: sefarkas
I thought the issue before the Court is whether the §1983 civil rights statute can be used to by-pass the regular civil habeas corpus statute in challenging whether lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment?
To: sefarkas
May be we are due for a new purge on FR to get rid of trolls and Bush haters whose only goal is to spread lies, distort the facts, and cause divisions.
18 posted on
02/02/2006 10:37:53 AM PST by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: sefarkas
Repeat after me:
"Knee Jerk. Knee Jerk"
21 posted on
02/02/2006 10:38:59 AM PST by
RockinRight
(Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR...)
To: sefarkas
I wonder if this is part of his faith. Certain Catholics believe life is not to be taken by men of faith, even when serving in their role according to Romans.
Not saying it's the answer, but it's a ventured guess.
To: sefarkas
Wishful thinking by the MSM. This vote was procedural, to grant a stay until the appeal could be considered on the merits. Doesn't indicate anything about his philosophy.
25 posted on
02/02/2006 10:45:06 AM PST by
colorado tanker
(We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats in the Senate"!)
To: sefarkas
Alito is catholic. He doesn't believe in killing people when it can be avoided.
I'm not catholic, but I am (mostly) against the death penalty. He's not the only conservative that ever lived to see it the way I do.
29 posted on
02/02/2006 10:52:16 AM PST by
JamesP81
To: sefarkas
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito....I just love saying it.
32 posted on
02/02/2006 11:26:36 AM PST by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: sefarkas
39 posted on
02/02/2006 3:43:53 PM PST by
Coleus
(IMHO, The IVF procedure is immoral & kills many embryos/children and should be outlawed)
To: sefarkas; Coleus
Could hardly wait to go liberal Perhaps he is been consistantly pro-life?
45 posted on
02/02/2006 4:56:09 PM PST by
Irish_Thatcherite
(~~~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~~~)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson