Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWingRadio
How exactly can one be classified a 'neocon' when one has been a conservative for nearly a half century?

How exactly do you define the prefix, 'neo?'

156 posted on 02/02/2006 9:14:29 AM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: ohioWfan
How exactly do you define the prefix, 'neo?'

Not agreeing with them???

192 posted on 02/02/2006 10:25:25 AM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

To: ohioWfan

>>>
How exactly can one be classified a 'neocon' when one has been a conservative for nearly a half century?

How exactly do you define the prefix, 'neo?
<<<

Well the prefix "neo" and the suffix "con" are both incorrect. There is nothing new about them and they are not conservative. What we today refer to as "neocons", should really be considered part of the left (from whence they came). Neos are big government types, fully comfortable with the welfare state at home and the warfare state abroad.

The mistaken "con" suffix is related to the fact they came from the anti communist left. They make nice noises about tax-cuts and smaller government but that is not their driving belief. The driving belief is in the restorative powers of government especially abroad and especially through the use of the military.

To be fair, unlike others on the left they want expansive government to make America stronger whereas as leftist internationalism aims to make America weaker.


215 posted on 02/02/2006 11:47:33 AM PST by evilC ([573]Tag Server Error, Tag not found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson