Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alito splits with conservatives on first case
MSNBC ^ | 2/2/06 | AP

Posted on 02/02/2006 5:26:31 AM PST by Boston Republican

Alito splits with conservatives on first case Votes to stop Missouri from executing killer contesting lethal injection WASHINGTON - New Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito split with the courtÂ’s conservative wing Wednesday night, refusing to let Missouri execute a death-row inmate contesting lethal injection. Alito, handling his first case, sided with inmate Michael Taylor, who had won a stay from an appeals court earlier in the evening. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas supported lifting the stay, but Alito joined the remaining five members in turning down MissouriÂ’s last-minute request to allow a midnight execution.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alito; mediabias; michaeltaylor; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: kimosabe31

THE SKY IS FALLING!!!


41 posted on 02/02/2006 9:30:03 AM PST by smith288 (The older I get, the dumber I become as im wise enough to acknowledge how much more there is to know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
The Supreme Court has blocked two executions in the past week, and has agreed to use one of the cases to clarify how inmates may bring last-minute challenges to the way they will be put to death.

OK now we got it. Alito is just going along with the challenge. I don't see how lethal injection is cruel and... but thats separate.
42 posted on 02/02/2006 10:00:50 AM PST by madconserv (Proud to be FReepin--Support Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: blitzgig

"Of course not. They simply read the case differently than Alito did. Each justice has to use his own judgement when analyzing the details of individual cases. In this case, Alito simply read the case differently than Scalia, Roberts, and Thomas. Nothing wrong with coming to differing conclusions based on analysis."

Yes, and that's why Sandra Day O'Conner was sometimes on the side of Scalia, Thomas and Rehnquist and sometimes on the side of Bader-Ginzberg, Breyer, Souter, Kennedy and Stevens.


43 posted on 02/02/2006 10:23:24 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Boston Republican

I love this guy. Showin' a little "rope a dope" to the dems. They'll just be that much more disappointed.


44 posted on 02/02/2006 10:26:06 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

O'Connor kept switching sides all the time because she had no underlying judicial philosophy to guide her. On lots of the big cases, she voted with the liberals because she was swayed by political correctness and what she considered "public opinion."

That's not going to happen with Alito. His judicial record shows a consistent philosophy of upholding the rule of law and not making up things that are not in the Constitution.


45 posted on 02/02/2006 10:34:06 AM PST by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson