Yes I am a lawyer. As best I can tell, Alito, Roberts, and the Clinton appointees voted to expend taxpayer $$$ to keep murderous punks alive to consider the "legal theory" that execution by lethal injection violates the Eighth Amendment. Bush is 0-2, based on what I have seen so far, although more votes will be required to reach a definitive conclusion, of course.
If FreeRepublic were inhabited by genuine conservatives, they would be burning down the White House (figuratively, with letters, calls and protests) to make sure we get a real conservative next time. Then we would still be down 4-5, but all hope would not be lost of restoring the Constitution.
So, you are a lawyer, and an expert. As such, you should do a better job for your jury. All I see on your posts are rants, and posturing.
Please enlighten us where he disagreed, or mis-interpreted, with the law. I am not a lawyer (as previously stated) and don't have such a view. You have not given any evidence to convince me, your juror, that they have done the ills you claim.
Which part of the Constitution do you think they overlooked?