So, you are a lawyer, and an expert. As such, you should do a better job for your jury. All I see on your posts are rants, and posturing.
Please enlighten us where he disagreed, or mis-interpreted, with the law. I am not a lawyer (as previously stated) and don't have such a view. You have not given any evidence to convince me, your juror, that they have done the ills you claim.
Which part of the Constitution do you think they overlooked?
The common sense part. I regard claims that death by lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment as utterly frivolous. As I understand it, and I could be wrong, the Eighth Circuit stayed the execution to consider this frivolous claim.
The State of Missouri sought then sought relief from the Supreme Court, arguing, in substance, why are you interfering with our sovereign processes to let these evil murderers litigate a frivolous claim. Alito and Roberts both denied relief to the State of Missouri. This is not an action that I think any genuinely conservative judge (of which there are only 2-3 on the Supreme Court) would take.
When you see the truth, and you see that most other people are blind to it, it tends to make you rant. But the facts are the facts, at least as reported so far.