[Mo1]

Well, this is not good; this is the same thing we raised holy hell about the Clinton White House doing.

The difference here is that it's Libby's lawyers that are accusing the prosecutors

"Lawyers for defendant I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby this week accused prosecutors of withholding evidence the Libby camp says it needs to mount a defense"

In Clinton's case it was the other way around ... it was the prosecutors that were accusing the Clinton's

[mosquitobite]

Exactly. The responses on this thread have me way more confused than the story itself! I thought I read it

• Libby's lawyers say turn over evidence
  
• Fitz says we HAVE turned over evidence
  
• Libby's lawyer says "are you SURE?" and seems to have evidence to contradict Fitz.
  

  *shrug* Did I read it wrong?