Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police Apologize, Drop Charge Vs. Sheehan
yahoo ^ | 2-1-06

Posted on 02/01/2006 3:27:09 PM PST by LouAvul

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 02/01/2006 3:27:12 PM PST by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Just as long as they used the tazer, dismissal of charges is OK.

I love the smell of electricuted hippie in the morning.


2 posted on 02/01/2006 3:28:13 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Very funny that Sheehan got tagged, but supporting the troops is a protest? One thing this country has lost...common sense!


3 posted on 02/01/2006 3:29:22 PM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

The full body cavity search may have been a bit extreme.


4 posted on 02/01/2006 3:29:35 PM PST by JustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

This works quite nicely. She didn't get to make her protest, and now she can't use her arrest to get more press time by challenging it in court.

Poof! She's vanishing. Never should have annoyed Hillary, I tell you.


5 posted on 02/01/2006 3:29:51 PM PST by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lOKKI

Nobody is even reporting on it today............before they dropped the charges.


6 posted on 02/01/2006 3:30:35 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie
The full body cavity search may have been a bit extreme.

Thanks. That's a mental image I really didn't need.

7 posted on 02/01/2006 3:31:15 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

No liberal would vote for a hippie who can't even get arrested.


8 posted on 02/01/2006 3:32:56 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lOKKI

No, it's the Botoxer primary challenge they see as a threat.

Outflank on the left --- sure bet in the Dim primaries, especially in CA.

Of course, even in CA, someone as dumb and leftist as Shehasbeen could not get elected.


9 posted on 02/01/2006 3:34:22 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Guests in the gallery who wear shirts deemed political in nature have, in past years, been asked to change or cover them up.

And now I guess the Rats in Congress will demand that this change when it's THEIR guests who want to wear inappropriate tee shirts.

And I'd like to know if the guest of Congressman Granier (sp?) who was asked to leave is the scowling Arab who was sitting on the Democrat side of the room.

10 posted on 02/01/2006 3:36:36 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
There is no doubt in my mind that she fully intended to cause a scene by yelling something out in the middle of Bush's speech. What Pelosi and the other progressives wanted was everyones nightly news to have two clips one of bush speaking and the other of the"peace mom" being removed for heckling the President. They probably already had some voice over written about how the cost of the war in Iraq was made clear to the President.

It is really just an extension of the news story about how Bush's domestic problems followed him to the summit in South America. Left wing reporters instead of asking real questions try to embarrass him in front of an International audience and thats what qualifies as having your domestic problems follow you.
11 posted on 02/01/2006 3:36:44 PM PST by Jonah Johansen ("Coming soon to a neighborhood near you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

The shame is on you and your wife Mr.Young. The police should not have to apologise for doing the right thing.

Like the woman who was thrown off the airplane for an inappropriate T shirt. She had no class and obviously since only your wife and Cindy Sheehan showed up in T shirts she and Cindy have no class either.

The SOU address is no place for T shirts. If someone had shown up with a Confederate T shirt on the whole mess would be up in arms. If any t shirts are allowed then all T shirts must be allowed and if you havent class enough to recognise that then you dont belong in the House.

I salute your wife for supporting the troops, but she should pick a better place to do it . How about at Walter Reed on any Friday night. I am sure the freepers there would welcome her.


12 posted on 02/01/2006 3:37:07 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
If Cindy Sheehan's son were alive today he would ASHAMED of his mothers' actions.

He knew the risk when he signed up and he paid the ultimate price for the United States of America - May God grant his soul eternal rest.

As for his mother, she needs a genuine ass whupping from at the hands of the young man's father.

13 posted on 02/01/2006 3:37:16 PM PST by DeaconNoGood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Jihad Cindy should not be there. I consider her to be a security risk. And if she takes one step towards the president the secret service should do what their trained to do.


14 posted on 02/01/2006 3:41:56 PM PST by buckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

It is pretty obvious why they dropped charges, they didn't charge the republican's wife, so they either had to charge both of them or neither, they chose to drop charges on the Cindy Dog, the best of a bad situation.


15 posted on 02/01/2006 3:42:41 PM PST by calex59 (seeing the light shouldn't make you go blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59
On the bright side -- now there will be guidelines about decorum. That's good. And because, last night's display by the Democrats just proves that written guidelines had best be authored -- in re decorum.

lol!

16 posted on 02/01/2006 3:45:18 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alia

The guidelines have always been there, but some people think guidelines apply to everyone else.


17 posted on 02/01/2006 3:49:15 PM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: buckeyesrule

I agree. She's starting to remind me of Squeaky. Obsessed stalker.


18 posted on 02/01/2006 3:49:17 PM PST by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Arrested!

19 posted on 02/01/2006 3:51:26 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
***She's starting to remind me of Squeaky.****

A caller into Matt Drudge's readio show on sunday night said the same thing.

20 posted on 02/01/2006 3:52:39 PM PST by buckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson