Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phantom Lord
I don't think Andrew Sullivan has ever been considered a "conservative". More of a liberal who knew that his parties stance on total and complete obstruction to reforming social security was the wrong stance and he encouraged young people, based solely on the issue of privatizing social security to vote for Bush.

He was an early and vocal supporter of the decision to invade Iraq and was scathing in his criticism of the anti-war movement. But, bizarrely, the moment Bush announced his opposition to gay marriage Sullivan did a 180 on Iraq. He tied himself in rhetorical knots to explain why he dedided to support Kerry, a man for whom he had previously had nothing but contempt.

42 posted on 02/01/2006 12:47:02 PM PST by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: jalisco555

As with most homosexuals, their entire lives and everything they are involved with revolves around one thing and one thing only. Their sexual practices. Nothing else matters.


46 posted on 02/01/2006 12:54:28 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

I've always perceived Andrew Sullivan as a mole. He attempted to proliferate and popularize the idea among Republicans that homosexexual "marriage" and homosexuality were good things. Note that he made a very good income out of posing as a needy man with AIDS among conservatives and after he'd received quite a good sum, was exposed as simultaneously soliciting elsewhere for homosexual sexual relationships without precautions.

And, his petulent dissatisfaction with President Bush and the GOP afterward was the finale I do believe worked best to fulfill his performance: to the effect, 'the GOP has abandoned me because they won't support "gay marriage"' and quite a bit of extensive theatrics afterward.

It's a process that first suckers people in, then uses them, then attempts to steal them away by commisserating with them about unhappinesses. His purpose seems to have been to create disharmony and objection and to feel sorry for him was to be suckered in, sorry to say.


72 posted on 02/01/2006 2:31:05 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson