Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/01/2006 11:43:25 AM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SirLinksalot

So much for the freedom to practice one's religion.


2 posted on 02/01/2006 11:46:39 AM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

One word answer - FAIRTAX - same word again - FAIRTAX


3 posted on 02/01/2006 11:46:53 AM PST by kentj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

I think there is a story in the Bible about you should take care of your parents before giving to the church. Anyone back me up?


4 posted on 02/01/2006 11:47:07 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Sounds as if the only thing that's being restricted is how seniors can dispose of their wealth in order to be eligible to have Uncle Sugar (via our tax dollars) pay for their nursing home.


7 posted on 02/01/2006 11:53:01 AM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

If they are moving assets to avoid paying their medical bills then something should be done. They should have bought long term care insurance if they had that kind of money, and should not expect the American tax payer to pay for care they should be responsible for IF THEY HAVE THE MONEY?

I have my long term care insurance and if they have that kind of money they should have it also.


I


15 posted on 02/01/2006 12:21:55 PM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

This is a classic example of legislation that is written in such a general way that the "rule of unintended consequences" takes over. In this case the giving that you must report is not restricted to your church or charity, but could be construed to include gifts you give to your children or even your parents. The law may be needed to close a loophole for the rich, but the unintended consequences would effect us all.


19 posted on 02/01/2006 12:29:14 PM PST by White Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot


If you don't want the government poking into your business, don't use taxpayer funds. Simple.


21 posted on 02/01/2006 12:33:02 PM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Its funny that politicians dont mind the rich like Ted Kennedy using loopholes to keep what they have but shame on a middle class person getting to use one.


23 posted on 02/01/2006 12:54:26 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson