Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frankjr; Cboldt

"Exactly what her status is isn't pertinent to the question of whether or not his answers to investigators were deliberate misdirection."

But it is pertinent to the question of exctly what Fitzgerald was investigating.

A sting to entrap people in a non-crime?

That's novel.


19 posted on 02/01/2006 10:43:36 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: angkor

I agree that this material certainly should be turned over. It's very interesting that Fitz has resisted turning over what seems to be clearly discoverable Brady material. Fitz may not be the "straight arrow" we've been led to believe??


23 posted on 02/01/2006 10:59:11 AM PST by colorado tanker (I can't comment on things that might come before the Court, but I can tell you my Pinochle strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: angkor
You introduce the very common "investigation is bogus, so lying to investigators can't be a crime" defense.

Fitz risks the ramifications of not checking for "covert" first, but I can understand the preference to exit the process with a "no report, no crime committed" without giving a reason.

And Libby risked being caught telling a lie to investigators, when the truth would have resulted in a "no report."

The Judge is having a hearing this Friday to discuss the various discovery motions.

24 posted on 02/01/2006 11:03:17 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson