I agree that this material certainly should be turned over. It's very interesting that Fitz has resisted turning over what seems to be clearly discoverable Brady material. Fitz may not be the "straight arrow" we've been led to believe??
"Fitz may not be the "straight arrow" we've been led to believe??"
The day he gave his speech and repeatedly claimed that Plame's job was "classified", I knew he was crooked.
"Covert" as defined by the Identities Act and "classified" as used in the colloquial are two entirely different animals.
But Fitz was clearly trying to conflate the two meanings.