Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

"Exactly what her status is isn't pertinent to the question of whether or not his answers to investigators were deliberate misdirection."

I agree. I just don't know what motive would be if he did not believe she was classifed.


16 posted on 02/01/2006 10:21:28 AM PST by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: frankjr; Cboldt

"Exactly what her status is isn't pertinent to the question of whether or not his answers to investigators were deliberate misdirection."

But it is pertinent to the question of exctly what Fitzgerald was investigating.

A sting to entrap people in a non-crime?

That's novel.


19 posted on 02/01/2006 10:43:36 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
I just don't know what motive would be if he did not believe she was classifed.

See my #14, above. It seems he knew for a fact that her status was not "covert."

"Covert" being shorthand for "Nobody but you and some in the CIA know that you and the CIA have any relationship whatsoever." A janitor in the CIA cannot be "covert," but his personnel file is classified.

21 posted on 02/01/2006 10:54:40 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson