Bob Woodward has already said the CIA did an informal damage assessment and no damage was done. I believe the CIA has said there has been no formal damage assessment...which begs the question that if Plame was so covert then wouldn't the CIA rush to do a thorough assessment????
Oh, they probably want her employment records to verify she was a desk jockey.
1 posted on
02/01/2006 8:25:42 AM PST by
frankjr
To: Mo1; Howlin; ravingnutter
2 posted on
02/01/2006 8:46:29 AM PST by
Peach
To: frankjr
Good news.
There can no excuse for holding those records back.Scooter has a right to defend himself and Plames status is central to the case,IMO.
Fitzhooey should co-operate if justice means anything to him.
Bring it on!
To: frankjr
hey Fitz... can you say, D-I-S-C-L-O-S-U-R-E??? i knew that you could!!!
5 posted on
02/01/2006 8:59:21 AM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: frankjr
Do you think that this will drag on until W pardons Scooter when he leaves the Oval Office?
Then we will see the wailing and the gnashing of progressive tooths!
8 posted on
02/01/2006 9:10:47 AM PST by
montomike
To: frankjr
It's interesting that nowhere in the indictment does the Special Prosecutor even claim that Libby knew Plame's employment was classified. If he didn't what's his motive to deliberately lie about discussing her with reporters?
To: frankjr
The media and their Rat friends are going to rue the day that they started pushing this. Sounds like Libby's lawyers are doing everything right to expose that this case is nothing but a media driven fraud.
33 posted on
02/01/2006 11:21:08 AM PST by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: frankjr
The defense team for I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby also asked that the court require Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald to turn over any informal assessments conducted by the CIA to determine whether the leak of Plame's identity in July 2003 damaged national security or agency operations. Fitz is gonna rue the day that he claimed that Plame's CIA employment was classified and that her employer was not common knowledge.
37 posted on
02/01/2006 11:24:22 AM PST by
dirtboy
(My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
To: frankjr
This is a great example for the MS of "be careful what you wish for"!
43 posted on
02/01/2006 11:59:26 AM PST by
SuziQ
To: frankjr
Libby's Lawyers Seek Papers on Plame's CIA Employment
Libby will walk.
Unless Plame, her CIA bosses and lawyers watched "24" to learn how
to alter the work records of a counter-terrorism agent.
It's gonna' be fun if the real records get leaked and reveal her
to be a lame-to-average field agent...and a desk jockey for at least
five years before the Libby incident.
But of course, a CIA operative of conservative convictions would
have too much moral fiber to engage in an illegal leak concerning
national security. Hence, we won't see the records.
56 posted on
02/01/2006 1:09:03 PM PST by
VOA
To: frankjr
I'm still trying to figure out why this guy or anyone should get prosecuted for having a bad memory?
It's not like he stole and destroyed top secret documents implicating an ex-president's culpability in 9/11?
I hope they get enough information made public to show that she was just a disgruntled civil servant and her husband was a reckless unemployed jerk.
Fitzgerald asked for this, now he has to deal with it.
63 posted on
02/01/2006 2:02:56 PM PST by
newnhdad
To: frankjr
Bob Woodward has already said the CIA did an informal damage assessment and no damage was done. I believe the CIA has said there has been no formal damage assessment...which begs the question that if Plame was so covert then wouldn't the CIA rush to do a thorough assessment???? I heard on that very reliable news source, Randi Rhodes show, that an assessment had been completed and they have positively identified operatives that have been killed due to Plame's identity being divulged!! Wackos, every one of them.
72 posted on
02/01/2006 6:16:43 PM PST by
p23185
(Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin during wartime considered Sedition?)
To: frankjr
Libby's lawyers should also zero in (I expect they are doing so if legally feasible) on Joe Wilson's interactions with the NY Slimes editors, WaPo morons, etc. in the 2-3 months BEFORE Novak's column. We all know that Joe was chatting up Kristof at least as early as May 3, 2003 and it has been indicated that Valerie Pflame was present at that breakfast and at the "Senate Democratic Policy Council" meetings around May 2. Libby's lawyers should insist upon deposing Kristof, all relevant NY Slimes and WaPo editors, and anyone else who may have been told by Joe before mid-July 2003 anything at all about Valerie's role at the CIA.
79 posted on
02/01/2006 8:19:08 PM PST by
Enchante
(Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
To: frankjr
Music to my ears .. this is the road to the highway, where the rubber meets the road ... go get 'em, Scooter!
80 posted on
02/01/2006 9:09:52 PM PST by
STARWISE
(Sedition:an illegal action inciting resistance to lawful authority- to cause the overthrow of govt)
To: frankjr
Was this the thing Bush was supposed to get impeached over before the current thing or was it some other impeachable thing?
84 posted on
02/02/2006 12:45:14 AM PST by
woofie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson