To: FreeKeys
Iranians from that era will tell you that he wrested control of the nation's oil assets from the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) -- a construct of post-WW2 British colonialism.
In either case, there was absolutely no reason for the U.S. government to basically help serve as the guarantor of British Petroleum's investments in the Middle East.
19 posted on
01/31/2006 9:14:26 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
(Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
To: Alberta's Child
In either case, there was absolutely no reason for the U.S. government to basically help serve as the guarantor of British Petroleum's investments in the Middle East.That makes sense. But you don't see ANY truth to the suggestion that Iran had become our strongest ally in the Muslim world? Or that Iran was showing more modernity than the rest of the Muslim world? At all? Do you think past mistakes, Ike's or whoever's, absolves Carter of his?
21 posted on
01/31/2006 11:07:48 PM PST by
FreeKeys
("Multiculturalism is based on the lie that all cultures are morally equal." -- Michael Barone)
To: Alberta's Child
"Iranians from that era will tell you that he wrested control of the nation's oil assets from the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) -- a construct of post-WW2 British colonialism. In either case, there was absolutely no reason for the U.S. government to basically help serve as the guarantor of British Petroleum's investments in the Middle East." Have these Iranians also mentioned the other reason(s) why the CIA was ordered to intervene ?
22 posted on
02/01/2006 12:45:35 AM PST by
odds
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson