While I am not upset that Cindy got arrested, but for wearing a shirt? That is considered protesting? Seems kinda harsh. I really wish that she was arrested for something more substantive. As it stands, this will only give her more cannon fodder.
Unimportant charge for an unimportant person
She was wearing a T-shirt under her blouse that had something on it. She took off her blouse. She was told to put her blouse back on and refused. Outta there.
"While I am not upset that Cindy got arrested, but for wearing a shirt?"
I'm hearing that she tried to unfurl some kinda banner.
It was misreported. Other media outlets are saying she was trying to display a banner. THAT is definitely illegal in the House chambers.
Even some of the DUmmies have more sense than you.
If it gives her more "fodder" (no pun intended?) that will be helpful in the hoped for challenge to DiFi.
I don't see a shirt. I see something (a banner) in her hand. The t-shirt story is a lie.
"While I am not upset that Cindy got arrested, but for wearing a shirt?"
Actually, she was arrested by the fashion police for wearing what appears to be a black, velour jogging suit.
Might have. If Shithead hadn't given a statement to the press only hours before that she would NOT protest at the speech, out of respect to the congress creature who had invited her. So Sindy just flat out lied, and couldn't even manage the several days that Senator "Lurch" Kerry maintained as a flip-flop minimum.