Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ranch is signed over to 2 immigrants
Arizona Daily Star ^ | January 26, 2006

Posted on 01/31/2006 1:23:08 PM PST by Irontank

Two immigrants are now the legal owners of a Douglas-area ranch seized from an anti-immigrant activist. Documents granting the 70-acre ranch once owned by Casey Nethercott to Fatima del Socorro Leiva Medina and Edwin Alfredo Mancia Gonzales were signed by a Cochise County judge on Monday.

Nethercott is serving a five-year prison term in Texas stemming from a 2003 incident on a Texas ranch where he confronted Leiva and Mancia and was accused of pistol-whipping them. He was acquitted of assault but convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Nethercott was a member of the group Ranch Rescue, which works to protect private property along the southern U.S. border.

The Southern Poverty Law Center brought suit against Nethercott on behalf of the two immigrants. Nethercott did not respond and a Texas judge ordered him to pay $500,000.

Also named in the suit were Jack Foote, the founder of Ranch Rescue and the owners of the Texas ranch, Joe and Betty Sutton.

The Suttons settled for $100,000. Foote also didn't offer a defense and was ordered to pay $500,000. Leiva and Mancia were illegal immigrants from El Salvador. They received temporary legal status in the United States as crime victims and are seeking visas to stay longer.

They don't plan to hold on to the ranch, said Kelley Bruner, an attorney for the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Instead the property will be sold, with the proceeds going to the immigrants


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; atf; banglist; batf; bordersecurity; bushamnesty; disgusting; illegalaliens; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; invasionusa; openborders; otms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last
To: highball

You all are missing the point. The property owners were forced to settle for more than they had, apparently, paying the settlement with the ranch. The other defendants had no interest in the ranch and are presumably judgment-proof.


81 posted on 01/31/2006 2:05:42 PM PST by Iconoclast2 (Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Iconoclast2

I will gladly be pistol whipped for a free ranch.


82 posted on 01/31/2006 2:07:01 PM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Iconoclast2
Yep, imagine if you are the property owner and the only witness that can defend you is locked in prison out of state.

That's not my reading of this article. The defendant is in jail out of state, but there's no indication that he was unavailable. On the contrary, he never bothered to respond to the lawsuit.

Neither did another party, who is presumably not in jail. I wonder why these guys didn't want to fight it?

83 posted on 01/31/2006 2:07:13 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan
I don't understand what the heck is going on with our Justice system.

We don't have a justice system. We used to. But all we have now is a legal system.

84 posted on 01/31/2006 2:07:22 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chris1

I agree with you, however, I disagree strongly with letting Slick off the hook. Both are culpable, and President Bush & the Repubs must act.


85 posted on 01/31/2006 2:08:37 PM PST by Thom Pain (Supporting the Constitution is NOT right wing. It is centrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

This whole issue WILL cause this country to disintegrate.


86 posted on 01/31/2006 2:08:45 PM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Two things:

First, Nethercott never even answered the suit, and second, he tried to shelter the property by transferring it into his sisters name.

87 posted on 01/31/2006 2:08:52 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Iconoclast2
You all are missing the point. The property owners were forced to settle for more than they had, apparently, paying the settlement with the ranch. The other defendants had no interest in the ranch and are presumably judgment-proof.

Where did you read that the others were judgment-proof? Is that why you think they didn't offer a defense?

And while it does appear that they had no recourse but to hand over the ranch to pay the settlement, that doesn't explain why they never responded to the lawsuit in the first place.

88 posted on 01/31/2006 2:09:46 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Thom Pain

Clintigula should be in jail. It is just that the problem is far worse now than it was under him.

The GOP has no interest in doing what 75% of the people want. They want cheap labor, end of story.


89 posted on 01/31/2006 2:10:11 PM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: girlangler
trying to find out who this judge is. This is ridiculous.

It doesn't matter who the judge is, if you don't respond to a lawsuit, you lose automatically, by default.

90 posted on 01/31/2006 2:11:03 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

He probably could not afford to defend it.


91 posted on 01/31/2006 2:11:04 PM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
We don't have a justice system. We used to. But all we have now is a legal system.

Well, in this case, a legal system is what's called for. It was a civil claim.

I'm still wondering why he didn't respond to the suit. The fact that he didn't respond makes it awfully hard to find fault with the judge's ruling.

92 posted on 01/31/2006 2:11:51 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
Sounds like the Vast Left Wing Illegal Immigrant Conspiracy
is starting to produce real fruit. Pistol whip? This sounds cold but the fact is had he chosen led poisoning he'd probably still own his ranch.
93 posted on 01/31/2006 2:11:55 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

So much for property rights in America. But hey, they work cheap, and somebody else pays for their health care, so who cares?


94 posted on 01/31/2006 2:12:16 PM PST by Euro-American Scum (A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris1

And I agree with you again. That's why they don't get any contributions from me until they take action.


95 posted on 01/31/2006 2:12:45 PM PST by Thom Pain (Supporting the Constitution is NOT right wing. It is centrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: chris1
"GWB has created the climate"

The lawsuit was heard by a jury and the jury ruled against Nethercott.

If Nethercott is your hero, is Nethercott's body guard, Tiny, also your hero?

96 posted on 01/31/2006 2:12:47 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Euro-American Scum
So much for property rights in America.

If you think you can ignore a lawsuit, you run the risk of losing right to your property....

97 posted on 01/31/2006 2:13:08 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

In the 80's or early 90's, did you ever hear of illegals suing and obtaining property??????

No one would even believe it if you told them.

GWB has basically created a whole safe harbor nation with his garbage and everything is now possible. Illegals sue, get welfare, get education, medication, and most other benefits citizens get, without paying corresponding taxes or having similar citizen duties. Why not sign them all up for the draft like all 18 y/o???


98 posted on 01/31/2006 2:19:38 PM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: sheana
The plantiffs got 100 grand from Sutton, zero from Jack Foote because all his assets are protected in Texas. This "so called ranch" is 70 acres and was not worth anywhere the value of the judgement.

They had a million dollars in judgement and got probably 70 grand, which they had to split with the lawyer.

99 posted on 01/31/2006 2:19:41 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: chris1

People were being sued for damages before Bush was born.


100 posted on 01/31/2006 2:29:43 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson