Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio GOP poised to gut election protection... [Barf Alert. Voter ID - YES!!]
The Free Press ^ | 1/31/2006 | Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

Posted on 01/31/2006 12:24:17 PM PST by Uncledave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: E Rocc

I don't know about Ohio, but in PA, people who don't have a driver's license can get a photo ID, I think from the agencies that issue drivers licenses. My MIL has never driven, but she votes every election. She has also found over the years that she needs to have a photo ID, so she got one. I would think that if this law is passed, then info needs to be given to people arrested of DUIs on how to get a photo ID.


21 posted on 01/31/2006 12:48:50 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
It gives you alternatives other than a drivers license. You don't have to have all those papers, just one for ID purposes.
22 posted on 01/31/2006 12:49:30 PM PST by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Despite grassroots protests and bitter opposition from Common Cause, the League of Women Voters and other pro-democracy liberal activist groups. There that's much closer to the truth
23 posted on 01/31/2006 12:51:20 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Funny how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

If Democrats aren't allowed to cheat, they think election are not fair.


24 posted on 01/31/2006 12:52:09 PM PST by Pittsburg Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

If Democrats aren't allowed to cheat, they think election are not fair.


25 posted on 01/31/2006 12:52:21 PM PST by Pittsburg Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Excellent news. I'd prefer a photo ID requirement, but it's a start.


26 posted on 01/31/2006 12:53:02 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
"It's meant to allow Republican "challengers" to intimidate anyone who turns up to vote in heavily Democratic precincts."

Translation: This will intimidate anyone who shows up with false identity and attempts to cast an illegal vote, because it will now be a felony to do so.

27 posted on 01/31/2006 12:53:41 PM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
Requireing a bank statement and utility bill does seem ridiculous. What if your apartment fee includes utilities, or you simply don't have a bank account?

Uh..I believe that it was either a Photo ID or ....

28 posted on 01/31/2006 12:54:22 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Funny how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

This article is amazing!

The word "disenfranchise" was not used even once.


29 posted on 01/31/2006 12:56:57 PM PST by Disambiguator (Making accusations of racism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Yep - nothing more discriminatory about a free democracy than insisting only those eligible to vote actually get to vote, and only once! The nerve of the Ohio GOP...


30 posted on 01/31/2006 1:01:20 PM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
This and the other repressive legislation passed by the Ohio GOP will make it virtually impossible for anyone but a Republican to carry the Buckeye State in future statewide and federal elections.

They say that like it's a bad thing.

31 posted on 01/31/2006 1:01:56 PM PST by Steve0113 (Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. -A.L.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
"Only one presidential candidate---John F. Kennedy in 1960---has won the White House without carrying Ohio."

"And he couldn't have pulled it off without the ballot stuffing in Illinois"

I think the Rats that wrote this garbage forgot that part.
32 posted on 01/31/2006 1:02:30 PM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Juan Medén

It discriminates against Illegal-Americans and Dead-Americans and those who excercise a multiple franchise. This discrimination is because these groups vote preponderantly (99.994%)for Democrats.this political ethnicism and groupism at its worst.


33 posted on 01/31/2006 1:10:30 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Mickey Mouse is just one example of the disenfranchisement of Fictive-Americans.


34 posted on 01/31/2006 1:11:38 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
That's OR bank statement or whatever.
35 posted on 01/31/2006 1:12:59 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
The bill is designed to help end free elections and continue the process of installing the GOP as America's permanent ruling party.

That is the truly sneaky and malicious intent of the drive for honest elections.

36 posted on 01/31/2006 1:14:57 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Wow. No words can describe how maniacal these people have become.

It's simply amazing how people spin can facts to support their neuroses. Trying to end voter fraud = rigging elections?

They're right about one thing though, this measure would probably ensure GOP domination. Demographics are trending increasingly Republican, and if the limited democrat base's fraud (felons voting, snow birds voting in both Ohio and Florida, etc...) is eliminated, republicand should sew up the state.

37 posted on 01/31/2006 1:17:15 PM PST by cchandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Thanks for posting this. I was wondering earlier today what these commie nutjobs were doing. Assumed they would be busy participating in some sort of organized protest against Alito, but I guess they have their hands full in Ohio.


38 posted on 01/31/2006 1:19:07 PM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

What is the problem with showing ID?

I like knowing ACTUAL people who are registered are voting.


39 posted on 01/31/2006 1:27:28 PM PST by Mikey_1962 (I grew up in a slum, when I got to college it had become a "ghetto".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
"Uh..I believe that was photo ID, or.."

Then stay after school and read it again. It says:

Section 35-05.18 of HB3 requires restrictive identification requirements for anyone trying to vote in an Ohio election. Photo ID, a utility bill, a bank statement, a government check or other government document showing the name and current address of the voter will be required."

It lists four documents without using the word "or". The fourth document is a 'government check'. The word "or" does not appear until after 'government check', then it goes on to say that another form of government document will suffice to substitute for the 'government check'.

Also please note that utility bills and bank statements are not 'government documents', therefore in this structural content it can ONLY mean that the first three requirements are seperate from the 'government document' requirement. So excuse me for paying attention to grammar, sentence structure and content.

40 posted on 01/31/2006 1:40:43 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson