Posted on 01/31/2006 10:28:22 AM PST by katieanna
This is worth repeating: Alito "can immediately participate in court decisions."
I hope the Dem's regret for a long time, their poor treatment of our newest SC Justice.
ap Update on the article
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/alito;_ylt=Ajeb_IY44RD6A6NQ7TWWQ_NuCM0A;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
WASHINGTON - Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. was sworn in as the nation's 110th Supreme Court justice on Tuesday after being confirmed by the Senate in one of the most partisan victories in modern history.
Alito was sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts in a private ceremony at the Supreme Court building across from the Capitol at about 12:40 p.m. EST, court officials said.
Alito and his wife, Martha-Ann Bomgardner, along with other members of the court and their spouses, attended the ceremony in the justices' conference room. The 55-year-old New Jersey jurist took both the constitutional and judicial oaths so he can immediately participate in court decisions.
Alito will be ceremonially sworn in a second time at a White House East Room appearance on Wednesday.
"Sam Alito is a brilliant and fair-minded judge who strictly interprets the Constitution and laws and does not legislate from the bench," President Bush said after the vote. "He is a man of deep character and integrity, and he will make all Americans proud as a justice on our highest court."
Alito's swearing-in came only hours after the Senate voted 58-42 to confirm Alito — a former federal appellate judge, U.S. attorney, and conservative lawyer for the Reagan administration from New Jersey — as the replacement for retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who has been a moderate swing vote on the court.
All but one of the Senate's majority Republicans voted for his confirmation, while all but four of the Democrats voted against Alito. Republican Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted no and Democrats Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Kent Conrad of North Dakota, Tim Johnson of South Dakota and Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia voted yes.
That is the smallest number of senators in the president's opposing party to support a Supreme Court justice in modern history. Chief Justice John Roberts got 22 Democratic votes last year, and Justice Clarence Thomas — who was confirmed in 1991 on a 52-48 vote — got 11 Democratic votes.
Bush and Alito watched the vote together in the Roosevelt Room of the White House. Bush shook Alito's hand and aides erupted in a long round of applause when final approval came.
With the confirmation vote, O'Connor's resignation became official. She resigned in July but agreed to remain until her successor was confirmed. She has been at the court this week, and participated in one last appeal Tuesday. She voted with the other eight justices to refuse to block a Florida execution. She begins teaching a class at the University of Arizona law school later in the week.
A court spokeswoman would not say if O'Connor attended the swearing-in ceremony.
Underscoring the rarity of a Supreme Court justice confirmation, senators answered the roll by standing one by one at their desks as their names were called, instead of voting and leaving the chamber. Alito and Roberts are the first two new members of the Supreme Court since 1994.
Alito is a longtime federal appeals judge, having been confirmed by the Senate by unanimous consent on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia on April 27, 1990. Before that, he worked as New Jersey's U.S. attorney and as a lawyer in the Justice Department for the conservative Reagan administration.
It was his Reagan-era work that caused the most controversy during his three-month candidacy for the high court.
Alito replaces O'Connor, the court's first female justice and a key moderate swing vote on issues like assisted suicide, campaign finance law, the death penalty, affirmative action and abortion.
Critics who mounted a fierce campaign against his nomination noted that while he worked in the solicitor general's office for President Reagan, he suggested that the Justice Department should try to chip away at abortion rights rather than mount an all-out assault. He also wrote in a 1985 job application for another Reagan administration post that he was proud of his work helping the government argue that "the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion."
Now, Alito says, he has great respect for the Roe v. Wade decision as a precedent but refused to commit to upholding it in the future. "I would approach the question with an open mind and I would listen to the arguments that were made," he told senators at his confirmation hearing earlier this month.
Democrats weren't convinced, with liberals even unsuccessfully trying to rally support to filibuster Alito on Monday. "The 1985 document amounted to Judge Alito's pledge of allegiance to a conservative radical Republican ideology," Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada said before the vote.
They also repeatedly questioned Alito at his five-day confirmation hearing after he would not discuss his opinions about abortion or other contentious topics. At one point, his wife, Martha-Ann, started crying and left the hearing room as her husband's supporters defended him from the Democratic questioning.
"To Judge Alito, I say you deserve a seat on the Supreme Court," said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
While many predicted a dramatic showdown — similar to the filibuster battles and all-night talkathons that happened with Bush's lower court appointments — it never happened.
The GOP's 55-vote majority was enough to ensure confirmation, and it was supported by groups like Progress for America, which said it would spend as much as $18 million on confirmation battles. The 44 Democrats were not able to keep their party unified enough to filibuster Alito despite calls from groups like People for the American Way, the Leadership Conference for Civil Rights and the Alliance for Justice.
Groups both for and against Alito spent slightly less than $2.5 million on advertising. That's nearly double the amount spent on Roberts' nomination, said the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law and the Justice at Stake Campaign.
Alito was not the White House's first choice — or even second choice — for the Supreme Court. Bush picked Roberts when O'Connor first announced she was stepping down last year.
When Roberts was promoted to the top spot after Chief Justice William Rehnquist died, the White House again passed over Alito for the vacant seat, instead selecting White House counsel Harriet Miers.
Miers' withdrawal following a barrage of conservative criticism in late October prompted Alito's nomination and some liberal complaints that he would be beholden to conservatives.
"I am who I am. I'm my own person. And I'm not like any other justice on the Supreme Court now or anybody else who served on the Supreme Court in the past," Alito said at his confirmation hearing.
___
On the Net:
Senate: http://www.senate.gov
White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov
Supreme Court: http://www.supremecourtus.gov
"I am who I am. I'm my own person. And I'm not like any other justice on the Supreme Court now or anybody else who served on the Supreme Court in the past," Alito said at his confirmation hearing.
---
and that's why the heathen raged , long and hard, red and ashen faced, at his hearings. :-)
Darn, I was hoping Judge Roberts would swear him at the State of the Union Address tonight.
I dare any one of those dems + Chafee to try to make nice after all the ugly things they've said and done.
And I do NOT want to see Harry Reid attempt to hug President Bush in the aisle either coming or going.
I DO want to see the unhappy faces of Hillary, Schumer, Kennedy, Kerry, Leahy, Lieberman, Biden, Levy, et al......'hope they all drown in their juices of hate for both the President and Judge Alito.
Justice Alito will have huge smile on his face. Can't wait to see the "smirk" on the President's face when he introduces him.
Seems like a lot of the dims make a point of getting close to the aisle so as to be seen with the President. They smile into the camera while stabbing him in the back.
"He's in for LIFE!"
As of Jan 06, avg age of Justices on the Right = 57.75 yoa
As of Jan 06, avg age of Liberal Loon Justices = 72.5 yoa
Kennedy - supposed moderate is 69 yoa
Net, Forces of light have nearly a 15 year age advantage. Bite me Libs!
"It's one thing replacing a conservative with a conservative (Roberts for Rehnquist) and a conservative with moderate (Alito for O'Connor), but replacing a liberal with a conservative would be political armageddon -- the Donkeys would go absolutely ape and the GOP would have to use the nuclear option. ......if they're able to. (I suspect if either Ginsburg or Stevens plans on retiring soon they'll at least wait until after the midterms, hoping the Dems can regain control of the Senate)."
I think it's fair to ask what the Dims would do if the total situation were reversed. Would they hesitate to replace a conservative with a liberal? E.g., Whizzer White replaced by Ruth Buzzi.
Not a nanosecond! We should act in exactly the same manner! Fair is one of the Dim's favorite words and .. what's fair is fair.
Good lord, woman, content matters! She was a fan of creeping socialism and internationalism. Doesn't matter her gender or how she looked - she was on the court for her intellect, which was gravely flawed. It doesn't help women to have a poor exemplar in place, no matter how high the place.
Yep, let's hope that if one of the SCOTUS libs retires shortly GWB will have the guts to replace him/her with a "polarizing" nominee. .....and we can all then watch Kennedy's big tomato head burst.
Such as?
I hate to break it to you, but the mother-in-law of a FReeper I know very intimately had colon cancer in 1982, and is still living to create drama whenever and wherever she can.
really? well in that case: dear justice Stephens, thank you very much for serving, now go and go into your deserved retirement! Please?
the good ones are the youngest!!!!
the good ones are the youngest!!!!
Reminds me of the statue of Lady Justice. She is most often portrayed with scales and a blindfold.
The blindfold illustrates that justice is blind to any difference of the parties before the court. Justice is impartial and not decided by the person, but the law. The scales illustrate that justice is equally weighted, no matter who stands before the court.
I don't believe that a Supreme Court Justice is to further any cause but that of the constitution and the law.
I still doesn't mean I can't admire her a woman.
"I think this one actually went through pretty well, considering how contentious it was."
My aunt was in labor for 2 1/2 weeks straight; she also said it went pretty well, considering. I.e., there is no way in Hades that this went pretty well - you must have been watching via the Twilight Zone.
I didn't say the whole process was good. I said it went THROUGH pretty well, as presumably your aunt's baby did at the ultimate moment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.