Anti-Evo complaint #2(actually used by the long since banned "Gore3000"): "Don't give us links! if you really had any facts to back up your argument, you'd post them here!"
Welcome to the "heads-I-win; tails-you-lose" world of anti-evo posting style complaints.
A blast from the past:
[Ichneumon:] But no, I'm not going to compose a personal reply from scratch every time someone repeats a fallacy for the 200th time, when there are perfectly good FAQ filesAnd this one:[Gore3000:] Goodbye loser. More excuses from a lame evolutionist. You do not even understand your stupid theory, you cannot even argue for it and give facts in favor of it. All you can do is make up nice sounding names for links that prove nothing at all. If you and your lame friends have any facts to disprove my statements - post them here. You do know how to cut and paste do you not? Or are you too lame for that also?
[Lurking Libertarian:] Lurkers, please note: evidence of transitional forms was posted back at post # 1169[Gore3000:] No, that is not evidence at all. Links are not evidence. Unnamed skulls are not evidence. If you have evidence, post it here. If you cannot bother cutting and pasting it so that we all can see it and discuss it then it is not worth anyone's bother.
The evolutionists are always 'linking' because they hope no one will look at the nonsense they are linking to and believe that their claims. Put your evidence here for all to see.