Well, I hate to tell you this but creationists understand real science and also know the difference between junk science, philosophy and illusions. People can paste and copy all the evolutionary philosophy and junk science and say to themselves see "let them refute this" Well, there are scientific refutes to most of this junk science so do you want me to start pasting pages of refutes? So I can say see? Why don't you just pick your best example of facts that support your claim and let us all focus on that.
600
You're kidding, right? If that's the case, why do they keep screwing up even the most elementary concepts when they try to talk about it, why do they keep asking questions that are answered in the most introductory biology textbook, and why do they keep making hundreds of claims that are demonstrably false, fallacious, or completely idiotic?
You guys are legends in your own minds, but you don't know squat about science, because you keep making the silliest errors about it, the kind that would embarrass the average junior-high-school student.
Tell you what, you've inspired me -- I'm going to start collecting every creationist blunder and screwup, and post the whole list every time some AECreationist tries to declare that *creationists* are the ones who actually understand science. Watch for it!