Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
Exactly. It is not the physical process itself.

Exactly. I'm the one who said it was an algorithm. You're the one who said it was a physical process. Put the beer down.

328 posted on 01/31/2006 2:08:28 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]


To: Right Wing Professor
I'm the one who said it was an algorithm.

An algorithm is an abstraction that may be applied to any physical phenomenon. As such it repesents the phenomenon and is not identified coterminously with the same. Mathematical equations, too, are representative of abstract thought. Attributing the variation of specices solely to mutations and natural selection and nothing more is certainly an interesting way to interpret the data, but there are any number of theories that could be just as explanatory, especially since both of these are applied post facto. Neither an abstract mathematical equation, nor conjectures related to causes of speciation, have need of making direct reference to theological ramifications. But it is generally held that science seeks accurately to explain objective reality. It is free to do so in terms of intelligent design.

350 posted on 01/31/2006 2:49:31 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson