[Dimensio]

OK, then lay out the TOE, and point out the possibility that God may have created everything we see.

To which "God", out of the thousands of deities worshipped and acknowledged throughout human history, do you refer and why should that particular deity be "pointed out" as something that "may" have been involved to the exclusion of all other possible deities?

Also, why make mention of a supernatural entity in a context that cannot, in any way, address the supernatural?

There is no mention of God, because the TOE assumes His non-existance.

Absolute poppycock. Not mentioning an entity is not the same as assuming or stating that said entity is non-existent.

[ShadowAce]

why make mention of a supernatural entity in a context that cannot, in any way, address the supernatural?

That is exactly my point. Science is not the only begetter of Truth, and all these threads deriding creationists just make me shake my head in disbelief of the hypocrisy going on.

What I see are evolutionists mocking Christians because the Christians' faith doesn't match up to your naturalistic world view.

You choose to limit yourself and your beliefs to what you can touch, see, smell, and measure. There is more to life than the physical world. When you limit yourself to believing that science is the only begetter of truth, then you are making initial assumptions that should not be made.

The reason I connected the TOE and no mention of God and no other scientific theory, is that the TOE directly contradicts the Christian creation story. Relativity, gravity, etc. are merely theories observing how the universe works. The TOE attempts to explain our origins, creation (yes, I know, but the TOE relies on the Big Bang, etc. theories), and tries to discredit the Creator.