[darbymcgill]

Perhaps you could explain how the statements conflict or how either amounts to "conspiracy"?

Ok...

statement 1: Each abuse report and its corresponding post stands on its own. If you think we're gonna hash through hundreds of posts to see "who started it" you're nuts.

statement 2: The mods started a thread to see who was causing the flame wars, and it turned out to be the creationists. emphasis added

The mods didn't start a thread out of thin air to find the flamers because they don't read hundreds of posts to know there are flame wars going on... if they did, they wouldn't need to start a new thread to trap them, they would already know who the bad guys were.... someone enjoined the mods to help relieve the EVO/CREVO threads of some abusers...

These aren't my opinions, but the facts as you guys have posted them... We may differ in our opinions as to how to define the event, but I can't see as how the facts have been disputed...

[Dimensio]

someone enjoined the mods to help relieve the EVO/CREVO threads of some abusers...

Of course it has nothing to do with the high volume of abuse reports that went flying when a crevo discussions got heated. And it couldn't possibly be that a creationist asked the mods to engage in such a search. No, it must have been a collaboration of those on the evo side deliberately seeking to have gore3000 banned through no fault of his own by asking the mods to "investigate". And by "investigage", they really meant "ban gore3000".

It's just a vast evo-wing conspiracy, isn't it?