Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

I don't know why, but it sure seems like that site is cheering for the other guys.


5 posted on 01/29/2006 5:42:58 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: FreeAtlanta

Yep, almost all of the sites I've seen (with the exception of US gov't sites, of course) that keep track of casualties lean left. Their agenda's clear. It's especially noticable when you look at sites that claim to keep track of civilian casualties.


7 posted on 01/29/2006 5:53:08 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: FreeAtlanta

Sure they are.

The idea is to shock you.

Red6


9 posted on 01/29/2006 6:04:12 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: FreeAtlanta

It's just pure data, rather we like it or not. If the situation improves more, that should be reflected within the data, and put mud in the face of DUmmies. It's still in bad shape, but you would notice if you watch very close that there has been very little casualties of US Armed Force in the Anbar province since the recent operation around Al-Qaim. You would also notice very little in Tal Afar and Mosul, once where terrorists were operating. Most of the casualties today are occuring around the capitol.


24 posted on 01/29/2006 11:57:22 PM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson