Actually it is. As long as the bounty hunter is breaking into the CORRECT house.
Ih a bounty hunter has information that a fugitive is hiding out at a certain address, he has the right to go there, kick the door in, enter the place, cuff and drag the fugitive away...all without a warrant.
However, if the bounty hunter makes the mistake of breaking into the wrong house, then he's up S$%#s creek without a paddle.
Without a warrant? I'm betting George W. Bush is behind this somehow.
And it's an entirely different standard for law enforcement, which is my point in posting this.
Why is that, do you think?