Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


4 posted on 01/29/2006 11:45:34 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: UWSrepublican

ping


6 posted on 01/29/2006 11:48:21 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Mia T. bump.


10 posted on 01/29/2006 11:53:52 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: All

Note that Saddam was doing a nuke deal with China.


17 posted on 01/29/2006 12:06:44 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Zacs Mom

ping


18 posted on 01/29/2006 12:09:37 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

ping


19 posted on 01/29/2006 12:10:10 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Republic

ping


20 posted on 01/29/2006 12:10:57 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

Thank you, Mia T.


23 posted on 01/29/2006 12:38:57 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Although I can surmise as to why the Bush admin may wish to not dwell on this, (intel., disclosure of info., etc) and I'm not so gullible as to believe Saddam didn't have WMDs.
I'm also reluctant to jump up 'n down and shout, 'They had 'em. they had 'em! They moved 'em to Syria!', a/c of prev White House and Presidential admissions that these weapons weren't there and they were mistaken about them for various reasons.

All of this, in the grand scheme of things will matter only after GWB is well retired.
What matters now, I believe, is focusing on keeping the White House free of insidious pests...whether they be liberal, Democrat, or even Republican.

This is why I advocate a positive approach to the nomination and election of our President on '08. And a "positive approach" is defined as propagating the benefits of a conservative agenda and one who will wholeheartedly and sincerely carry that agenda out to the best of his/her means.

35 posted on 01/29/2006 6:53:29 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson