Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Lenin
Just change the bullet to a hollow point and the 9mm would do the trick.

yeah, but they won't DO that. However if it were to happen, just how much more effective would a 45 JHP be? Everything is shot placement anyway. Could issue 22LRs and if we could be sure the troops could make the cranio-ocular shot everytime, it'd be fine. That being said, this is as much about troop perception as anything else. As long as the troops have the idea that a 45 will knock a man off his feet or blow his arm off they're gonna want that security blanket. Even if it comes in a FMJ. Because compared side by side, the 45 ball beats the 9mm ball everytime. Face it, in the realm of infantry combat if the bad guys get close enough to use a handgun, something has gone very badly wrong indeed. The possible exception being of course the tight quarters of clearing rooms or caves. Here, a 45 1911 ot better a 45 H&K with ah attached SureFire Gunlight would be superb.

141 posted on 01/29/2006 12:40:16 PM PST by ExSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: ExSoldier

Personally, I like the 357 over the 45.


147 posted on 01/29/2006 12:43:12 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson