I understand that..but it has more far reaching implications...I guess you dont want to discuss those...The matter of Terri Schiavo is the only thing to be discussed, right?
Yes, Terri Shiavo is mentioned in this article...but it must be admitted, often there are threads discussing something completely unrelated to Terri Shiavo, and yet, someone will start trying to introduce the matter of Terri
Schiavo into the discussion, and usually meets with complete failure, because simply the thread is not about her...This is not as blatantly the case here, but there are other issues to be discussed, issues of end of life matters, without the mention of Terri Schiavo...
I can read as well as anyone, and comprehend as well as anyone...and, the article also concluded with the mentioning that people dont want the govt sticking their noses into end of life decisions...that should be up for discussion as well..
Guess it wont be tho, this thread should be about nothing but Terri Schiavo....
It has been discussed. It has been discussed more on this thread than in the article, I'd guess.
Often there are threads discussing something completely unrelated to Terri Shiavo,
I don't think this thread should be required to "do penance" for all the other threads that "sinned."
It has more far reaching implications.
Of course it does. Maybe someone can post an article that would be a good jumping off point and start a more general thread.