A court perhaps...but some 20 other courts reviewed and judges affirmed this case and decision. As does common law stretching back hundreds of years. But the zealots here must defame any court or anyone who doesn't agree.
As I am sure you know, the other court reviews on this case onny looked that the evidence that the first court accepted into the record. Judge Greer refused much evidence that reflected the parents and other doctors evidence.
Definiton of zealot: someone who believes starving someone to death is wrong, especially when her family is opposed and wants to take care of her.
Definition of logical person: someone who thinks judges can never make mistakes, and that an estranged husband should be believed when he asserts "his wife's" wishes
Which of those courts actually revisited the case?