Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ContraryMary

it was an exceptional case which involved the life of an innocent human being. I personally have no problen with it.


100 posted on 01/29/2006 12:46:06 PM PST by TAdams8591 (The first amendment does NOT protect vulgar and obscene speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591
it was an exceptional case which involved the life of an innocent human being. I personally have no problen with it.

Life-and-death decisions are made every day for people who are unable to speak for themselves. It was, in that respect, a very ordinary case. What made it exceptional was not the fact that Terri couldn't speak for herself, but rather that Congress was interfering.

102 posted on 01/29/2006 1:06:12 PM PST by ContraryMary (New Jersey -- Superfund cleanup capital of the U.S.A.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson