Posted on 01/29/2006 10:06:22 AM PST by NormsRevenge
Thanks for providing the link that proves Frist didn't lie. That's nowhere close to a diagnosis. It's very similar to the tone my own doctor took when explaining that I needed further tests to determine if I had cancer. I didn't accept his advice as a diagnosis and begin chemotherapy and radiation. I got the tests he recommended. Terri wasn't allowed to get the tests that were recommended by Frist and so many others.
You're an example of the immaturity and hysteria on your side of this debate.
just can't help yourself can you...
Help me out here... I can tell you have something you want to say, I just don't know what it is.
Especially because bystanders are usually dragged into the supposedly private/family decision.
That happens because, whenever one person or group is guaranteed "rights," another group or person gets obligations to enforce or carry out those "rights." The people who are asked to enforce or carry out those "rights" may believe they are forced to act against their consciences.
* "[Nancy Cruzan, three days before her death from starvation] turned and looked at me and stared at me with a panicky look, sweating profusely, and the thought I had was, she was thinking, Oh, heres a policeman, hell help me. But we werent allowed to do that,"...Doug Seneker
Thank you. YOU get it.
I had to memorize lines from Goethe's eerie poem, Der Erlenkoenig in High schoolWer reitet so spaet durch Nacht und Wind?
Es ist der Vater mit seinem Kind.
Er hat den Knaben wohl in dem Arm,
Er fasst ihn sicher, er haelt ihn warm. [snip]
In seinen Armen das Kind war tot.
In the poem, the father keeps assuring his son that there is nothing to fear. In the end, his son is dead in his arms.
Felos's tongue-flicking assurances that Terri felt no pain were most likely untrue.
Felos not only made sure Terri died, he made sure she died in a horrible way.
I heard someone mention a this idea on TV about 2 weeks ago. When some folks demand rights for themselves they are, in reality, placing obligations on others, even though they pretend the whole situation is private.
The attempts of the pro-deathers to drag in unwilling outsiders is nauseating.
Every single law or regulation passed since then (and they are, by now, innumerable) has made the situation worse.
Those who say, don't know and those who know, don't say.
 Word up!
The government, in the form of a court, was already involved. What was wrong with giving the parents a say when the "husband" already had another life?
You followed my lead.
Gee, so you think feeding is such a big advance in technology? 
Or go to present day Holland.
Did you tell that to the clueless judge who allowed the "husband" to starve this woman to death? It was not HER decision, or her parents, just someone who profited from her death.
If Schiavo had allowed her true family members to make the decision, it would have remained private.
 My "Pursuit of Happiness" doesn't include being keep alive against my will.
That would not happen in most cases; this was an unusual case because a stranger who called himself a husband did not defer to the people who really loved this woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.