[Slump Tester]

"The basis of Wal-Mart's claim is that by agreeing to participate in the employee health plan, Debbie Shank agreed to reimburse the plan if it paid for medical expenses that were later compensated by a lawsuit award or settlement."

If she signed it, then Walmart SHOULD be reimbursed. Seems harsh, but why should they pay for everything if she signed this and then recieved a large settlement?

The amount of her settlement isn't Walmart's fault.

[From many - one.]

There could be some question as to whether the trust fund was to compensate for past espenses or to provide for future ones.

[Gaffer]

I don't have a problem with this as long as WalMart continues to honor her medical needs, because by seizing her repayment, they have claimed responsibility for her. She should for file for medical disability with the company and file for SSI. If this is not WMs intention, then a jury trial should clear this all up quick....

[shrinkermd]

Yes, you are right. If the facts are as stated this is common practice in Minnesota. I hate WalMart for having cheap, but good cookies. If it were not for Wat Mart my diet would go much better. Damn them!

What is worse not only are their cookies cheaper and better than my usual grocery store, WalMart actually makes money--a lot of money because they do a better job for me than their competitors. Something must be done!