Posted on 01/29/2006 8:07:57 AM PST by Flavius
When Tammy Klein began investigating crime scenes eight years ago, it was virtually unheard of for a killer to use bleach to clean up a bloody mess. Today, the use of bleach, which destroys DNA, is not unusual in a planned homicide, said the senior criminalist from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. ADVERTISEMENT
Klein and other experts attribute such sophistication to television crime dramas like "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation," which give criminals helpful tips on how to cover up evidence.
Prosecutors have complained for years about "the CSI effect" on juries — an expectation in every trial for the type of high-tech forensic evidence the show's investigators uncover. It also appears the popular show and its two spinoffs could be affecting how some crimes are committed.
"They're actually educating these potential killers even more," said Capt. Ray Peavy, also of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and head of the homicide division. "Sometimes I believe it may even encourage them when they see how simple it is to get away with on television."
A man charged in a recent double-homicide in northeast Ohio was a "CSI" fan and went to great lengths to cover his tracks, according to an affidavit filed by Trumbull County prosecutors.
Jermaine "Maniac" McKinney, 25, allegedly broke into a house, killed a mother and daughter and used bleach to remove their blood from his hands, prosecutors said. He also covered the interior of a getaway car with blankets to avoid transferring blood.
Prosecutors said McKinney burned the bodies, his clothing and removed his cigarette butts — which would contain his DNA — from the crime scene in Newtown Township, about 20 miles northwest of Youngstown.
He tried to throw some evidence into a lake, including a crowbar used to bludgeon one of the victims. The lake was frozen though and he shouted a profanity when the crowbar remained on the surface, according to the affidavit.
Investigators later recovered the evidence. McKinney, who was indicted this month on two counts of aggravated murder, aggravated burglary and other charges, could face the death penalty if convicted.
Cases where suspects burn and tamper with evidence seem to be increasing, said Chuck Morrow, chief of the criminal division in the Trumbull County Prosecutor's office.
"People are getting more sophisticated with making sure they're not leaving trace evidence at crime scenes," Morrow said.
Klein said most crimes aren't well planned and that detailed attention to prevent leaving trace evidence typically occurs in cases where someone has killed a family member or business partner.
"For the most part, our killings involve gang bangers who for the most part are pretty stupid," she said.
Sophisticated planning and concealment of evidence are aberrations, not the norm, said Larry Pozner, former president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
"Most people who commit crimes are not very bright and don't take many precautions," Pozner said. "CSI and all the other crime shows will make no difference."
Yet in the six years since CBS, which did not return phone calls seeking comment, introduced "CSI," there's been a trend of fewer clues like hair, cigarette butts and the killer's blood left behind at crime scenes, Peavy said.
The more sophisticated the television story lines get, the better equipped criminals will be, Peavy said, adding that he never watches "CSI" because it's too unrealistic.
Ooopps... oh well what are you going to do.
Now lets run a few more stories on the holes in homeland security, and how to sneak in to nuke plants.
Some of this column is totally bogus. Killers have known about fibers, dna, and other "trace" evidence for years--not because of crime shows, but because like anyone else, they follow the trials.
It probably doesn't have this effect. Unless people want secret trials instead of public trials, criminals will watch what happens--and no doubt take notes.
Yes, and how long ago did that rape happen? I'm betting quite awhile ago--most of those FF cases are a decade or so old. (Sometimes older.) It isn't the teevee that's educating them, it's just paying attention to the trials, where all the evidence (and how it's gathered) comes out.
Mrs. Flyer was watching one of those shows last night. They decided to glorify the "media" and "whistleblowers" when the female lead started leaking information about an anthrax investigation to the "media." They portrayed her as a "hero" for defying the Feds and leaking the information to the press. The old "the public has a right to know" syndrome don't ya know. Hollyweirdoes gives me the creeps.
I watched the original few episoded of CSI, but it didn't take long for me to see that it was definitely not "Law and Order."
There are a couple of shows that are particularly bad at advertising better methods for criminals. One was/is "Masterminds" on Court tv describing many criminal acts and techniques used to facilitate those acts.
It ought to be against public policy to re-enact criminal acts that might be emulated by others without sufficiently obscuring useful details for criminals. Another example is a show where two teams compete to steal something or other by defeating th security systems. DUmb beyond belief, and stupid to glorify idiotic behavior.
Utter nonsense. Please note that virtually every one of the "Masterminds" on that show were caught, some of them more than once.
Well, we don't know about the REAL smart ones - do we!?
Becase they got away with it!
Then you have criminals like OJ Simpson.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.