Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clive

What is a Grit, and why are they called Grits?


10 posted on 01/29/2006 9:03:59 AM PST by Savage Beast ("Live your best life." ~Oprah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Savage Beast
There was a 19th century reform party known as the Clear Grits, whose name derived from one of its members who described the membership as "all sand and no dirt; clear grit all the way through", a reference to good quality of a construction material.

That party is one of the several ancestors of the Liberal party. The term has lost its original content and the adjective and now simply means Liberal.

BTW, in Canada the terms "liberal" and "Liberal" have different although sometimes overlapping meanings. The Upper case L signifies the federal party or the provincial parties.

The same distinction applies to "conservative" and "Conservative".

Yanks may be more familiat with another name for Liberals, to wit, Whigs. Whigs and Tories ought to be familiar from Revolutionary War history. Canadian Liberals are still sometimes called Whigs although less so than they are called Grits. Canadian Conservatives are still called Tories.

12 posted on 01/29/2006 9:51:10 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Savage Beast
Grits is a nickname for the Liberal Party of Canada that dates from the 19th century. At that time the Conservative Party, which essentially founded the country, had policies of trade protection through tariffs and political and religious compromise with Catholics, who were then mostly French-speaking. The Liberals supported freer trade and opposed any kind of public role for the Catholic church. Their most ideological faction was called the Clear Grits; its leader had said he wanted followers who were "all sand and no dirt, clear grit all the way through".

The name stuck. The Liberals are referred to as Grits even today, although their policies have of course changed. The Conservatives are still referred to as the Tories, although the party of today is a suburban and rural middle-class party with very little "Tory" about it. The Liberals no longer support free trade; they still hate Catholics, but only in the context of hating all Christianity.

Regarding the Sheila Copps article, it is ridiculous that she thinks the socialist NDP made gains because the Liberals were "too far to the right". The NDP made gains because of the corruption issue; on some issues (like crime, for instance) they were actually to the right of the Liberals, something I don't think I have ever seen before.

13 posted on 01/29/2006 10:09:52 AM PST by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson