[Arkinsaw]

Conservatism does not advocate anarchy. Nor does it, or the Constitution, advocate unlimited freedom to do anything you please to disrupt public place

But it doesn't allow the government to kill a citizen who is disrupting a public place, or hold him without trial.....or IMO seize his private property.

Especially in the case where the owner has not been charged with a crime but has to "prove" that the property was not actually used for illegal purposes...or where joint owners lose their share of property even when they did nothing wrong. We have had cases of that stemming from all this.

[ChildOfThe60s]

I agree with you 100% regarding seizing property. This whole discussion has two issues. Pretty much all instances of property seizure nowadays are, IMO, unconstitutional. They are another example of government seeing a potential cash cow.

Regarding the noise, I consider myself libertarian on this issue. Just don't go around bothering other people indiscriminately (and deliberately).