Dance Hamas! Dance!
"We pledge to postpone the destruction of the Zionist pigs until after negotiations have concluded. Let's talk!" </hamas>
The man is a Islamo-fascist imbecile BUMP!
Dance Hamas! Dance!
A hudna is a strategic truce designed to deceive.
It will lull a superior force enemy into vulnerability, and then allow its destruction at a more strategic time.
Only a malicious, anti-freedom press would prevent this from being commonly known in the West.
So when a Radical Muslim tells you he is for a hudna (peace/truce), it is the most vile interpretation possible.
The hypocrisy is shameless, like the Rats. Recognize our government although we are terrorists who have killed Americans. But we refuse to recognize Israel's right to exist.
Easy enough to resolve - Israel destroys its sworn enemy.
But Liberal Rats from the UN on down are responsible for most of the world's on-going problems.
---------------------------
A long term hudna, a few attacks blamed on renegade terror groups can happen to keep the populace excited, is an excellent idea. If Hamas can stay quiet for 6 months to a year, the West will flock to their cause.
We just want to destroy Israel, not you. Heh, heh.
yes and we all know what a Palestinian truce is worth, and how long it will last.
But he added: "We can reach out to them with a long-term hudna (truce)."
I posted this on an earlier thread but if is appropriate here.
It's the old Hudna trick that the Jews fall for over and over again.
from 2003 http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/45884734/critiques/Hudna_With_Hamas.asp
Hudna has a distinct meaning to Islamic fundamentalists, well-versed in their history: The prophet Mohammad struck a legendary, ten-year hudna with the Quraysh tribe that controlled Mecca in the seventh century. Over the following two years, Mohammad rearmed and took advantage of a minor Quraysh infraction to break the hudna and launch the full conquest of Mecca, the holiest city in Islam.
When Yassir Arafat infamously invoked Mohammad's hudna in 1994 to describe his own Oslo commitments "on the road to Jerusalem," the implication was clear. As Mideast expert Daniel Pipes explained, Arafat was asserting to his Islamic brethren that he will, "when his circumstances change for the better, take advantage of some technicality to tear up existing accords and launch a military assault on Israel." Indeed, this is precisely what occurred in Sept. 2000 when Arafat & Co. launched a terror assault upon Israeli citizens.
As for Hamas, they have proven time and again their commitment to a tactical hudna — replenishing their strength during the quiet periods, then returning with increased deadliness. As recently documented by The Washington Institute, Hamas agreed to no less than ten ceasefires in the past ten years, and after every single one returned freshly armed for terror. Hundreds of Israeli citizens have paid for these hudnas with their lives.
But the Hamas leader said the plan, which he justified using Islamic tradition, is a temporary machination to ease international and U.S. hostility toward his group in hopes of receiving financial assistance, explaining Hamas will not give up its goal of destroying Israel.
Watch them make a peace (truce) initiative... and watch the world fall all over them...
They are not going to do anything to bring down Israeli wrath on them now.
They can not mount a successful war against Israel without first attaining a prerequisite target.
They must takeover Jordan first.
That is in fact what Hamas desperately wants. They should not be allowed to get away with it.
Dear Mahmoud, no one fears you, it's called loathing.