Posted on 01/28/2006 7:59:25 PM PST by doug from upland
Edited on 01/29/2006 4:22:05 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
A roughcut trailer for our film INDICTING HILLARY: One Man's Quest to Hold Hillary Clinton Accountable can now be downloaded from google videos.
This trailer is only a roughcut, and we hope to have an improved version out soon. It only touches the surface in exposing the largest campaign finance fraud ever. We are working furiously to have the first version of the film ready for a conference in Washington, D.C., in early May. Thereafter, we hope to have an extended version of the film for theatrical release. It's all a function of money. No big time Hollywood producer has come forward to open a checkbook as they did for the anti-American's crockumentary of President Bush. Our film really is different. It is filled with something called the truth.
Peter Paul still needs financial help with his civil case. It would have been much easier and he would have been much further along had Judicial Watch actually spent the millions they collected for his case.
We have been working with a very honorable man from the United States Justice Foundation, Gary Kreep, Yes, Hillary, Bill, and others are going to be under oath in a Los Angeles courtroom sometime later this year. Spinning attorney David Kendall is making his last gasp effort to have Hillary removed from the case.
For those who do not know the story, here are 26 episodes of PETER PAUL AND HILLARY
Great info is available on HillCAP.org.
NOTE TO HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON -- this is not going away. You have denied, delayed, dissembled, and distracted for far too long. You have been in this scandal from your fat ankles all the way up to your eyeballs. We have the smoking guns to prove that you allowed your campaign treasurer, Andrew Grossman, to file a third fraudulent report to the FEC on July 30, 2001. Your denials are BS. Even you cannot hide forever.
BTTT
You are so funny. Hillary is not shaking in her boots why should she. Everyone said the same thing about the Barrett Report and it hardly made a sound. This won't either. I found it poor quality and not enough gun powder. Go back to the drawing board and get something from her years as a Senator.
I would think that a "Lee Harvey Oswald" for the times would arise. Not advocating. But, she's that dangerous.
Thanks doug ... looks like powerful stuff ... you think Madame DeFarge's ritzy ditzy friends knew they were indirectly involved in illegal activity? Court TV would get a major ratings boost to have Cher et al to testify in open court. Maybe the FEC violation aspect would interes John Stossel?
Perhaps a second Barrett Report on the redacted info should be read into the Congressional record. Alternatively, Barrett should be interviewed for a piece on "What They Didn't Let Me Investigate."
This is a great film, Doug, but I don't see what good it does.................. Hillary's unraveling has begun in earnest, drip, by drip, by drip-into the national consciousness.
This is a very large drip!
Kudos to those who keep up the fight against this conniving empty-suit!
We expect the witness list in the civil case to bring out all the entertainment media to the trial.
We hope to add to the unravveling. Hillary's opponent in New York needs to get a million DVDs out to voters there. Yes, he would get a great package deal. :)
Ping
When you see Hillary sitting next to Peter at Spago, she is telling him how she doesn't use email anymore. As you may recall, they claimed that millions of emails were mysteriously missing.
BUMP
Excellent work!
============================================================================
Hillary Clinton told Hollywood crowd that impeachment of her beloved husband was unconstitutional
video footage | 4-30-05 | dfu
Posted on 04/30/2005 7:33:07 PM PDT by doug from upland
Hillary Rodham Clinton was not happy that Richard Nixon said some critical things about her in his final years. At an event in a West Coast home with some of the Hollywood elite, she had some interesting comments.
As she was introduced to the assembled guests, the man introducing her commented that Richard Nixon had said: "Watch out for Hillary Rodham Clinton. She is the next Eleanor Roosevelt."
And then, Hillary begins ---
"In fact...um...a little aside...um, that a...Nixon, um, spent quite a bit of time in his later years, a, criticizing me for all kinds of things without necessarily disclosing that I was on the impeachment staff...um...in 1974. You remember, that was the constitutional impeachment staff." Big laughs come from the leftist lapdog crowd.
Unfortunately, Hillary didn't necessarily disclose to her Hollywood pals what the Democrat chief counsel who supervised the attorneys investigating Nixon has subsequently disclosed.
For those who do not yet understand the danger posed by Hillary Rodham Clinton, read what Jerome Zeifman has written. I have spoken a couple of times on the phone with him. ZEIFMAN ARTICLE
Zeifman's book is Without Honor: The Impeachment of President Nixon and the Crimes of Camelot
(Here are some excerpts from his 1999 NY POST article)
By Jerry Zeifman
IN December 1974, as general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, I made a personal evaluation of Hillary Rodham (now Mrs. Clinton), a member of the staff we had gathered for our impeachment inquiry on President Richard Nixon. I decided that I could not recommend her for any future position of public or private trust.
Why? Hillary's main duty on our staff has been described by as "establishing the legal procedures to be followed in the course of the inquiry and impeachment." A number of the procedures she recommended were ethically flawed. And I also concluded that she had violated House and committee rules by disclosing confidential information to unauthorized persons.
In one written legal memorandum, she advocated denying President Nixon representation by counsel.
Hillary then advocated that the official rules of the House be amended to deny members of the committee the right to question witnesses.
During my 14-year tenure with the House Judiciary Committee, I had supervisory authority over several hundred staff members. With the exception of Ms. Rodham, Doar and Nussbaum, I recommend all of them for future positions of public and private trust.
-end excerpt-
Zeifman is a lifelong Democrat, not a member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. The lesson for all is that, if it serves her interest and agenda, there is literally nothing that she will not do. She believes herself to be above the law.
'Stop Hillary' bandwagon gathers pace
The Sunday Times ^ | January 29, 2006 | Sarah Baxter
Posted on 01/29/2006 12:49:56 AM PST by MadIvan
THE frontrunner for the Democrat nomination for president in 2008, Hillary Clinton, is heading into a hail of opposition from within her own party after a poll showed last week that most Americans would definitely not vote for her.
Aides in Bill Clintons White House are warning she could be a risky choice. To their left, an anti-war stop Hillary bandwagon is gathering momentum, threatening her ability to unite the Democrats.
Mike McCurry, Bill Clintons White House press secretary, fears the 2008 campaign could be brutal for the former first lady, now a senator for New York. He remembers how she became a lightning rod for the right during her husbands years in office.
She has proven that she works hard at being senator and does that job well, but bringing the country together and moving it in a different direction is an entirely different matter, McCurry said. It is very hard to reinvent yourself in politics.
A CNN/Gallup/USA Today poll last week found that 51% of Americans definitely would not vote for her and only 16% said they definitely would. Among men, 60% said they would not vote for her.
Leon Panetta, Bill Clintons former chief of staff, said there was nervousness among Democrats about backing such a controversial figure at a time when many Americans believe President George W Bush had polarised the country.
Like McCurry, he wondered whether Clinton was the kind of lightning rod that would stimulate all of the opposition and resurrect the hate side of the political agenda.
Ultimately the issue is: do we turn to something new? Weve been through the Clintons, weve been through the Gores, weve been through the Kerrys, all of whom are known quantities in politics, Panetta said.
Bush described Clinton as formidable in an interview ahead of his annual State of the Union address this Tuesday. Republicans are determined not to underestimate her voter appeal in 2008, particularly as they are short of well-known candidates.
This is an unusual year because this is the first time there hasnt been a kind of natural successor in the party, Bush said.
The Democrats have a new rising star in Mark Warner, who recently stepped down as governor of the conservative state of Virginia. His proven appeal to moderate voters is attracting Democrats of all shades who are anxious to win, but he remains little known on the national scene.
The doubts about Clintons electoral viability have surfaced as she romps towards re-election as New York senator this year.
She has already seen off one Republican challenger whose campaign was reduced to tatters and last week dispatched another, Ed Cox, the son-in-law of former president Richard Nixon. He turned down his partys increasingly desperate pleas to stand.
Clintons modest success with voters in small-town upstate New York is taken by some as proof that she can win over conservatives, although according to last weeks poll, 90% of Republicans will definitely not vote for her.
New Republic magazine, the left-of-centre weekly, argues in its current issue that the voters of rural New York bear little comparison to diehard Republican voters in the South and Midwest. She is going to have to bring something else to the national stage, it warned.
Clintons hawkish stance on the war on terror, Iraq and Iran has infuriated the anti-war movement. Molly Ivins, a left-wing commentator, wrote last week she would not support her for president. Enough, she fumed. Enough clever straddling, enough not offending anyone.
McCurry believes that, contrary to legend, Clinton is a conviction politician rather than a wild-eyed liberal, yet were she to become president her divisive reputation could get in the way of her programme for government. It would not be a comfortable place to be hunkered in a bunker for four to eight years getting pelted by the Republicans with rotten tomatoes, he said.
Clinton is waiting for her Senate race to be over in November before making a final decision on whether to stand. There is no doubt she would love to return to the White House, this time with Bill as first gentleman.
The further away he is from the centre of power, the more Bill Clinton has gained in popularity. If he returns to the fray, the cash-for-pardons scandal at the end of his presidency and the minutiae of his sex life are likely to be re-examined. And after two Bushes in the White House, two President Clintons could be regarded as overly dynastic.
In the Senate, Clinton has forged political alliances on such issues as heathcare with the rightwinger Newt Gingrich and on the environment with Senator John McCain, a 2008 Republican contender. According to McCurry, she is enjoying the role of consensus-maker.
She clearly understands there is a real need to re-establish some sense of bipartisan co-operation and has to assess, Could I be that kind of leader? That takes you to the question the polls raise, which is: would she get that opportunity?
Clinton has raised more than $15m (£8.5m) for her Senate re-election campaign, which could be diverted to a White House run. She has all the name recognition, money and ambition a candidate could want, but is keeping her options open about whether to stand.
Sometimes presidential campaigns take on a momentum of their own and they become inevitable, said McCurry, but she is wise enough to avoid that predicament.
Ping!
We are working out the details. We are still raising money to finish the film, and it is likely to be fairly expensive to give a message to Hillary in the final credits. We are also working out the details for pre-sales of the DVDs and sales of the gala concert DVD.
Thanks and keep up the good work!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.