Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Real Peasants' Revolt. They're rioting in China.
The Weekly Standard ^ | 01/30/2006 | Jennifer Chou

Posted on 01/27/2006 11:10:37 PM PST by XHogPilot

ON THE NIGHT OF DECEMBER 6, 2005, Radio Free Asia (RFA) received a frantic call for help from a resident of Dongzhou village, near the port city of Shanwei, in the prosperous southern Chinese province of Guangdong. The caller told RFA that hundreds of paramilitary police had moved into the area and were firing at thousands of villagers. The villagers had been protesting what they claimed was inadequate compensation for land that local officials had expropriated, and upon which a power plant was being constructed. As the caller screamed into his cell phone, "They are using real bullets on us!" shots could be heard in the background. The incident is referred to by some as "mini-Tiananmen."

According to official Chinese government reports, only three people died in this incident. The government further claims that the protesters initiated the violence with homemade explosives. Eyewitnesses, however, have a different story. They tell RFA that more than a dozen villagers were killed by paramilitary police attempting to quell the disturbance and that the violent reaction of the armed police was out of all proportion to the threat posed by the demonstrators.

In the midst of an economic expansion that is the envy of the world, there is one particular growth industry in China over which the country's stability-obsessed leaders are greatly distressed: the protest industry, especially the rapidly increasing incidence of large-scale protests. A few instances from the last 15 months:

* On October 18, 2004, in the southwestern province of Sichuan, a government official's altercation with a street vendor sparked a night of violent clashes between police and an angry crowd that, according to eyewitnesses interviewed by Radio Free Asia, numbered in the thousands. Paramilitary units were eventually sent in to restore order.

* Also in Sichuan province, on November 3, 2004, authorities dispatched paramilitary troops to quell a protest that lasted several days and involved more than 10,000 peasants, angry over what they viewed as inadequate compensation by the government for land to be used for a hydroelectric project.

* In August 2005, in the eastern province of Zhejiang, more than 1,000 paramilitary troops moved in on thousands of protesting villagers who had demanded the closure of a polluting battery factory that they said was responsible for the high level of lead content in their children's blood.

These "sudden incidents" or "mass incidents," in official parlance, are presenting Chinese officials with a serious problem that goes beyond the negative image of China they project to the outside world. The sheer numbers are noteworthy. In August 2005, the country's public security minister, Zhou Yongkang, announced that some 74,000 such events had taken place in 2004, an increase from 58,000 the year before. According to Zhou, 17 of the 74,000 involved more than 10,000 people, 46 involved more than 5,000 people, and 120 involved more than 1,000 participants. But many believe the actual figures are higher.

There are a host of reasons for these protests. Some involve wage and pension disputes, land requisitions leading to forced evictions, and the burgeoning pollution that has accompanied economic growth. And it has become increasingly common for rallies and other forms of collective protest to escalate into violent clashes between demonstrators and the police.

There is every indication that the government is bracing itself for further trouble. In November 2005, the Ministry of Public Security identified several threats to national security, including deepening discontent among the general public over official corruption, land expropriations, and the widening income gap. And, in a January 12 article in the Chinese Communist party's semimonthly Qiushi magazine (Seeking the Truth), the two highest ranking generals in the People's Armed Police (PAP) vowed to enhance the combat effectiveness of the one-million-strong paramilitary force so that it could deal with "sudden incidents." PAP commander Wu Shuangzhan and political commissar Sui Mingtai noted that this was necessary because these incidents had been growing in number, size, and degree of violence.

The PAP falls under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Public Security. Since the military crackdown on the 1989 Tiananmen democracy movement, vast resources have been injected into the PAP for better anti-riot gear, newer weaponry, and up-to-the-minute training. As China's principal force charged with ensuring domestic security, the PAP is the Chinese leadership's "first line of defense," and its troops are the first ones mobilized in cases of serious domestic upheaval.

Beijing has demonstrated strong determination in its efforts to control protesters through the PAP. As early as May 2004, public security minister Zhou Yongkang called for a buildup and more stringent drills to improve the PAP's capacity for dealing with potentially violent large demonstrations. And on August 18, 2005, the government announced the institution of specialized riot police units in 36 cities. The first such unit was set up in Zhengzhou, capital of volatile Henan province, where on July 31, 2004, paramilitary troops quelled with tear gas and shotguns a protest by villagers over illegal land requisition.

Of even greater significance is the fact that in August 2005 the People's Liberation Army Daily warned the country's two million soldiers that they would be severely punished if they participated in demonstrations. This warning, doubtless prompted by recent demonstrations in Beijing by demobilized soldiers demanding better pensions, suggests that China's leaders are worried not only about the grievances of displaced peasants, but also about disaffection among rank-and-file members of the military.

In addition to beefing up the training and deployment of PAP forces to deal more effectively with serious disturbances when they do arise, Beijing is increasingly employing methods aimed at nipping protests in the bud. For example, in September 2005, the government announced a sweeping ban on Internet material that "incites illegal demonstrations." And on January 7, Beijing announced that local officials who fail to report unrest and other emergencies to the State Council, China's cabinet, within four hours, will be punished.

Not surprisingly, China's domestic media are reticent about reporting the increasingly frequent large-scale protests and the government's violent responses. Yet China's protesters themselves are proving resourceful. Thanks to the call it received from an eyewitness, Radio Free Asia's Mandarin service was able to break the news of the December 6 shootings in Dongzhou village--and to transmit the information back to China so that people across the country could learn the very thing that their own government was determined to conceal.

Jennifer Chou is the director of Radio Free Asia's Mandarin service.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; commie; commiebastards; commies; communism; peasants; reds; selloff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last
To: zarf
Don't worry, Bill Gates says China's commies are just peachy.

So does Google. The Chinese would NEVER get the information on a Google search...Google says be damn to the Chinese, grab the money.

81 posted on 01/28/2006 11:54:48 AM PST by WaterDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
Would you be a content and complaisant citizen, if you lived there?

It depends. If I was a high level Party member, I would be quite content!

Many of the grievances the peasants have are the same as we have in the US. Our right to property and our right to defend it are rapidly eroding. At the fore, Second amendment rights plus the Kelo US Supreme Court decision regarding property rights/seizure compensation. I think Kelo is the one of the highest criminal violation of our Constitution, but I don't have the balls to respond appropriately.

82 posted on 01/28/2006 12:13:21 PM PST by XHogPilot (Islamophobia is NOT an illness. They really are out to kill us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WestwardHo

They probably were.


83 posted on 01/28/2006 4:10:22 PM PST by Maximus_Ridiculousness (Chloe O'Brian ROCKS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Maximus_Ridiculousness

How old is that shot, anyway? These troops are holding SKS rifles and the nickle plated thingie looks like an SKS with a wood pistol grip.

I thought the SKS was long gone from army usage everywhere.


84 posted on 01/28/2006 6:39:59 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

"Tanks and kalishnakovs are a tough nut to cracks".

Cocktails. Molotov cocktails.


85 posted on 01/28/2006 6:48:16 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

I think the photo is dated 10/05.


86 posted on 01/28/2006 8:07:38 PM PST by Maximus_Ridiculousness (Chloe O'Brian ROCKS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

The photo should be fairly recent, however those are parade photos as evidenced by the uniforms and shiny jackboots. In fact, a hidden caption describes the photo as "review of the honour guard welcoming ceremony, 21 June 2005 in Beijing, for visiting Prime Minister of the Republic of Korea Lee Hae-chan." The SKS shown in this picture are for ceremonial purpose. They have been phased out long ago, but as is tradition everywhere, an earlier rifle with bayonet lug and wooden furniture remains the choice for parades (for the retro effect. the Bundeswehr is still using KAR98's). The standard infantry rifle for the PLA presently are the Type 95 bullpup and the Type 81 which is being phased out.


87 posted on 01/28/2006 8:13:14 PM PST by cmdjing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Try 700 million (or more) illiterate rural peasants. In China's economy??? Wow.

Have patience. mexico is dumping their population on us as fast as they can. At the current and projected rate of infiltration from our south we will gain about 50 million more illegals in 10 to 12 years, bringing our total to 75 million illegal aliens in country. At that time China will only have 10 times as many. Also, it will mean that one in five persons in the uS will be an illegal...

Of course that will not work, total internal war will have occurred before then.

Kinda makes your hair stand up, don't it?

88 posted on 01/28/2006 9:12:43 PM PST by TLI (ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA, Minuteman Project AZ Day -1 to Day 8, Texas Minutemen El Paso, 32 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

700 illiterate ruralpeasants?

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html

Literacy:
definition: age 15 and over can read and write
total population: 90.9%
male: 95.1%
female: 86.5% (2002)

Not quite.


89 posted on 01/28/2006 9:13:31 PM PST by pganini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

Thanks for the ping!


90 posted on 01/28/2006 9:16:40 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
>>>The villagers had been protesting what they claimed was inadequate compensation for land that local officials had expropriated,<<<

These people whould have taken their claims against goverment use of emminent domain to the US Supreme Court.

Oh....wait. Maybe not. Didn't they just rule in favor of the City of Hartford grabbing private housing and giving it to developers to increase the tax base.

Sorry Chinese people...our governments seem to be thinking alike - at least in some things.

91 posted on 01/28/2006 9:34:12 PM PST by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pganini
Have it your own way. The Party, among others, disagrees with you.

ta-ta...

92 posted on 01/29/2006 10:53:56 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
but IMO the Chinese government will end control when they decide to, and not a moment before.

Which is probably never sadly.

93 posted on 01/30/2006 12:30:19 PM PST by Paul_Denton (Every single troll is now an enemy of the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson