Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Residents of California hamlet hit by '05 landslide file suits
AP State Wire via Fresno Bee ^ | 01-27-06 | GREG RISLING

Posted on 01/27/2006 5:25:45 PM PST by Amerigomag

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Residents of seaside La Conchita who lost their homes or relatives during a deadly landslide last year filed lawsuits against Ventura County and a private ranch company, claiming both were negligent in protecting the tiny community from harm.

Eighteen lawsuits were filed late Thursday in Ventura County Superior Court and another five were expected Friday, covering a total of 39 plaintiffs. Among the allegations are wrongful death, negligence, trespassing and damaged property. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages.

County officials have previously stated that they have warned residents about the dangers of living in La Conchita, about 70 miles northwest of Los Angeles, and are unsure there is anything that can be done to prevent the landslides. Several geologists who have examined the hillside believe it will collapse again.

(Excerpt) Read more at fresnobee.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: california; laconchita; landslide
Such is the California Way

A group of folks, seeking a hustle around California's skyrocketing coastal land values, plunk their mobile homes beneath a marine escarpment riddled with previous evidence of repeated slope failures and declare themselves a bona fide community.

Now they're victims and are due a comfortable retirement package from California's taxpayers and an adjacent land owner.

The California Hustle never ends.

1 posted on 01/27/2006 5:25:46 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Considering the geological hazards, I can't understand why any developer was allowed to build there. Why do insurance companies even agree to cover houses built in such obviously hazardous areas?
2 posted on 01/27/2006 5:28:32 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Dog

What attorney took their case?!


3 posted on 01/27/2006 7:05:32 PM PST by Snapping Turtle (Slow down and get a grip!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

Driving by La Conchita before the landslide, I never understood how someone could feel comfortable living underneath that looming hillside - especially since it's obvious that good ol' Mother Nature is going to keep on breaking the cliffs down. After all, millions of years ago that hillside stretched all the way out to the Channel Islands.


4 posted on 01/27/2006 7:15:50 PM PST by Moonmad27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

There is no insurance in that area, and no mortgages....the city/county washed their hands of it over 10 years ago...the people that moved back in were squatting.


5 posted on 01/28/2006 10:01:00 AM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Sounds like they have a very weak case. If insurance and mortgage companies wouldn't touch the houses, I can't see how the ranch could have any responsiblity when it was well known that landslides were very likely.


6 posted on 01/28/2006 10:20:41 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

They should sue gravity.

7 posted on 01/28/2006 10:29:28 AM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson