Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer

Nuclear reactor heat, which is usually wasted in condensors could be used to heat the shale. Or a dedicated heat exchanger just for shale oil extraction. Of course it would require a nuclear reactor but it would be much "cheaper" in terms of energy to get the oil from the shale.


56 posted on 01/27/2006 6:00:35 PM PST by Paul_Denton (Stom ta jora Ahmadinejad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Paul_Denton

Definitely some merit in that since nuclear to electic takes 10k BTUs of heat for 1 KWh of electricity (or 2/3 of the energy is wasted). But IIRC, someone said here once that the problem is getting that heat underground or distributing it underground in an area that lacks water.


74 posted on 01/27/2006 6:10:18 PM PST by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Paul_Denton

"Nuclear reactor heat, which is usually wasted in condensors could be used to heat the shale. Or a dedicated heat exchanger just for shale oil extraction. Of course it would require a nuclear reactor but it would be much "cheaper" in terms of energy to get the oil from the shale."

Nuclear energy is a great answer for that problem.
First, nukes generate a lot of heat and electricity, thermal efficiency is about 40% or less.

So piping both the heat and using the electricity could be a very efficient use of the energy from the reactor in the overall process.


192 posted on 01/27/2006 8:45:15 PM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson