Posted on 01/27/2006 2:17:36 PM PST by xmission
In Tuesday's Times, the paper detailed a leaked working paper from the office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction. The draft report was highly critical of the U.S.-led reconstruction of Iraq, deeming the effort a failure in large part. Though incomplete, illegally leaked and intended as an internal document for discussion, The Times chose to run the story.
Once again, The New York Times, not the Bush administration, has broken the law protecting our nation's security, violating U.S. Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 37, Section 798, pertaining to the illegal release of national-security information.
(Excerpt) Read more at patriotpost.us ...
The Times should be prosecuted. Sulzberger is not going to stop of his own volition. He is 100% for bringing the Bush Administration down. And we are in a conflict, not of our own chosing, in which secrecy must be maintained.
It kills me that the Abramov (sp) scandal gets all of this attention, and the fact that the Times is betraying us daily fails to get any notice!
Send some of those NYT guys to (to quote Office Space) Federal Pound you in the *** prison and it'll stop. That or fine the hly crap out of 'em.
The NYT should be shown as as what they are, "a desperate media outlet going broke" who would do anything to change their financial status.
Their Liberal slant isn't helping them.
I believe you are correct. I saw an article...somewhere.
...Snicker....
I think we should all send one of these packages to the NYT with a note saying - we think ya'll have a problem and maybe could use these? We should bombard them with these.
I don't know who is trying to provoke the administration more, Iran, Venezuela, or the New York Times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.